Andrew Everard:
Escapism:I have no experience of that, as my system was approx 6-7k, but it's still better.
Confused now - I thought the whole point was that you said your old system wasn't better.
Escapism:I think the fact WHF hasn't reviewed them is meaningless.
No, not meaningless - it's entirely in AVI's hands.
We are ready and willing to review the speakers, both in WHFSV and in Gramophone - where, as I have already said, I think they'd be a particularly good fit -, but for its own reasons the company has chosen not to supply review samples. That's not any matter of politicking, conspiracy or anything else, but a simple fact.
Sorry Andrew, you missunderstood, I meant the 9.1s sound and image better than my old system, IMO (others may not agree)
When I say meaningless, I'm talking about letting the fact you have not reviewed them go, and if anyone is interested in them go and have a listen for themselves. Its no big deal. Anyone in or around Bournemouth is welcome to pop round mine and take a listen.
Escapism:I have no experience of that, as my system was approx 6-7k, but it's still better.
Confused now - I thought the whole point was that you said your old system wasn't better.
Escapism:I think the fact WHF hasn't reviewed them is meaningless.
No, not meaningless - it's entirely in AVI's hands.
We are ready and willing to review the speakers, both in WHFSV and in Gramophone - where, as I have already said, I think they'd be a particularly good fit -, but for its own reasons the company has chosen not to supply review samples. That's not any matter of politicking, conspiracy or anything else, but a simple fact.
Sorry Andrew, you missunderstood, I meant the 9.1s sound and image better than my old system, IMO (others may not agree)
When I say meaningless, I'm talking about letting the fact you have not reviewed them go, and if anyone is interested in them go and have a listen for themselves. Its no big deal. Anyone in or around Bournemouth is welcome to pop round mine and take a listen.