Funnily enough Mark Knopfler was one of the first mainstream musicians to 'come out' in huge support of digital recording. Borthers In Arms was recorded and mixed entirely in the digital domain, though I don't know if it was Dire Straits' first album to be so.
Back in the 80s, digital recording meant 16 bit / 44.1 on 24 track tape, mixed down to 16/44.1 on a two-track. So be very wary of any "super duper high definition it's just like you're there better than CDs" remaster which might come out at some point, blagging you for money to re-purchase what you already own. Even if you don't share my healthy skepticism for high-definition remasters, no high definition remaster will put back what wasn't there to start with.
They know full well that as long as they use buzz-words like 'HD remaster', most punters - even so-called audiophiles - won't know or care about the technical aspect of things. Even on this forum, the way most people's eyes glaze over on threads discussing the technical side of recording / mixing / mastering is proof of that, while banging on passionately about what difference a bloody mains cable makes. So they adjust the EQ, adjust the compression, tweak the stereo widening/reverb, and bingo! Punters falling over themselves to say they've never heard it so good...