ellisdj said:
Did you try it with another source other than the Innuos?
I am surpised by your thoughts my short listen I thought would have easily highlighted brightness or flaw in the dac but I felt the opposite happened, it made a big impression on me of how good it was
The DAVE is really, really good at retreiving information of that there is no doubt. I was definitely hearing stuff that I hadn't heard before and I surmise that this is because the FPGA conversion and the DAVE's subsequent filtering is class leading. However, it has (I assume) been voiced to fall in to line with other Chord equipment, and it is here to my ears that the DAVE's ultra-revealing nature becomes excrutiating. Where had all the upper mid-range gone?!
As I said in my OP I have now firmly concluded that I am not a Chord man. I owned the QBD76 for a year or so, only selling it on in the end because it fatigued me, not because it wasn't very good because it was/is. Fatigue is why I am so bitterly dissapointed with the DAVE. EVERY review I read, and I have read them all, suggested that the DAVE was a departure from Chord's stock sound. It is not in anyway a departure I can confirm wholeheartedly, it is Chord to the core, or one of its many cores. Perhaps my anger should be vented at those reviewers not the product...
I do live a tiny bit on the dark side of neutral having flirted with Audio Research for pre-amplification and source on more than one ocassion. This has however always been in combination with SS for power amplification to add back some LF control, hence the reason I say a tiny bit on the dark side. Perhaps I have to learn to live with a slight loss of clarity in order to feed my desire for a little warmth. A cuddle from an attractive, yet big boned lady is perhaps what I crave.