macdiddy said:other than to inflate abacus's ego, NO ONE cares what the ASA does or say which is why they have no legal powers.
Leave us that know cables make a difference alone to spend what ever amount OF OUR MONEY we like on what we like.
*aggressive*
macdiddy said:other than to inflate abacus's ego, NO ONE cares what the ASA does or say which is why they have no legal powers.
Leave us that know cables make a difference alone to spend what ever amount OF OUR MONEY we like on what we like.
*aggressive*
Yes, that bit didn't make any sense! I’m surprised they make silly claims on the website because in print they claim nothing save that music lovers enjoy them!spiny norman said:"Whilst they further claim the ChordMusic streaming cable uses cutting edge digital amplifiers as well as do-it-all integrated amps and pre-amps..."
I very much doubt Chord Co made any claim that their cable uses digital amplifiers, or indeed any amplifiers. If the ASA is going to take companies to task for inaccuracy, you'd at least hope it would report the alleged inaccuracy accurately.
MajorFubar said:macdiddy said:other than to inflate abacus's ego, NO ONE cares what the ASA does or say which is why they have no legal powers.
Leave us that know cables make a difference alone to spend what ever amount OF OUR MONEY we like on what we like.
*aggressive*
Because customers who don't know enough about the subject to know better have the right to be legally protected from those trying to scam them out of money like the modern equivalent of Victorian confidence tricksters.
The problem is, the ASA have all the legal balls of my neutered cat. Really, it should be just an offence to make unsubstantiable claims about a product, with those who cross the line facing a substantial fine. In time it would wipe out all the snake-oil merchants that blight our hobby. Which IMO is a very good thing.
daveh75 said:MajorFubar said:macdiddy said:other than to inflate abacus's ego, NO ONE cares what the ASA does or say which is why they have no legal powers.
Leave us that know cables make a difference alone to spend what ever amount OF OUR MONEY we like on what we like.
*aggressive*
Because customers who don't know enough about the subject to know better have the right to be legally protected from those trying to scam them out of money like the modern equivalent of Victorian confidence tricksters.
The problem is, the ASA have all the legal balls of my neutered cat. Really, it should be just an offence to make unsubstantiable claims about a product, with those who cross the line facing a substantial fine. In time it would wipe out all the snake-oil merchants that blight our hobby. Which IMO is a very good thing.
@macdiddy is an utter ******* who clearly has issues with abacus and his objectivity....
davidf said:I’m sure virtually every manufacturer could be investigated by the ASA - I’ve never seen anyone grow wings after drinking Red Bull.
macdiddy said:other than to inflate abacus's ego, NO ONE cares what the ASA does or say which is why they have no legal powers.
macdiddy said:Leave us that know cables make a difference alone to spend what ever amount OF OUR MONEY we like on what we like.
*aggressive*
daveh75 said:@macdiddy is an utter ******* who clearly has issues with abacus and his objectivity....