1- 16bit
2,3,4,5,6,7- 8bit
8- 16bit
9,10- 16bit
10/10
I think this one was extremely difficult because of the lack of real instruments, noisy synth lines that I'm sure were clipping when they were mixed, and extremely brief vocal lines with no significant range... Therefore, there isn't really much to tell the difference with...
What the ear perceives in a song is I feel is largely if not wholly manipulated by the person at the arranging desk who arranges different tracks at different volume levels, adds panning for stereo effect, and plays with the dynamic range to prevent clipping and manipulates the phasing to prevent the cancellation of tracks...
When songs such as these have extremely low dynamic range (the difference between the quietest and the loudest sounds) there isn't really much to hold the comparison...
I once did the same tests with with 8, 16 and 24 with a lisa Batiashvili violin track... I was able to tell the difference! Though I do understand this isn't a case at all times, because of the way the track is mastered originally.
Sometimes though, with all this, whatever the difference, I have shockingly tend to prefer the lower quality one... For example the american idiot from HDTracks 192/24, and an AAC purchased from the iTunes store... I thought the soundstage was radically different but more deep in the AAC version... Really! You have to listen to that comparison! It's more than the Rumours by Fleetwood mac!
HAs anyone heard that album in high res and from the iTunes Store? If so which one was preferred?