"What's it going to "lose" though? A note? The underlying bass track? Neither.
I've owned plenty of CDPs in my time and they all transmit what's on the disc. Of all the players I've had (probably a dozen over twenty years, but quite a few in recent years), they haven't exhibited huge differences. I've had greater impact on sound by moving my speakers six inches either way and adjusting the toe-in a few degrees.
In tunrtable systems, or other analogue setups, then yes, the source is the key item. For digital though, it's speakers and amp first. CD players are by and large drawn from a narrower palette from an audio perspective IMO"
Well I've had several CDP's as well and the only thing they've had in common is that none of them have sounded remotely similar to each other. Some have offered much heavier and weightier bass whilst others offer a totally different perspective on the same recording - maybe brighter airier and more detailed top-end. Where can a CDP "lose" it, you ask. Well, I guess, although I certainly don't know that the choice of DAC might have something to do with it. Also, the analogue circuitry and possibly even the transport reading the coded disc. Clearly some players are very noticeably better at reproducing deep bass. Those that fail are "losing" it somewhere, either in the analogue stages or during the data retrieval or conversion from digital to analogue. The simple truth remains that if they aren't losing it, the CDP's "with it", must be adding / boosting something that wasn't there to start with.