hi i have the onkyo 5009 amp i want to no what would be the perfect partner 5.1 speaker package for this amp would the monitor audio apex 5.1 be good enougth or any other package that you can recommend thanks can somebody please reply asap please
Greenblood said:I want this room pounding with earth shaking sound!
Thngs aren't as cut and dried as they used to be v1c. I tried various speakers out to replace my old MK's, and struggled. But in the R series I found a worthy replacement. The UniQ has many benefits for AV, and this is easy to demonstrate, even with KEF's more budget speaker packages. Other than being streets ahead as far as music is concerned, they (R300's) sound more three dimensional than my old MK S150's, and are easier to drive. They're also sweeter sounding, and perform great at any volume.v1c said:MK Sound 950+ surround system.
Now extremly limited dealer wise but well worth the effort to source.
You will be hard pushed to find anything to beat MK for movies.
I have to say Nick's recommendation is a strong one, and not one I can argue with. Although for me, the term "I want this room pounding with earth shaking sound!" is open to interpretation. What one person sees as "earth shaking", another might see as a "tickle"Greenblood said:Sorry to jump on the thread, but what speakers would you recommend if size was no issue?( I am considering this same amp) My room is 4.4m wide by 7.5m long rectangle with screen on the narrower wall. Considering a 7.1 system rather than 5.1, and a budget up to £5000 absolute tops for speakers alone. I want this room pounding with earth shaking sound!
Don't get me wrong v1c, I still like the M&K sound, and I still like what they do, but I've been trying for years to find out why I couldn't find hi-fi speakers to do what M&K/MK did. I did find out part of the reason, but still couldn't find anything. As I mentioned earlier, a couple of manufacturers have taken quite a step forward with their speaker design over the past year or two, and we're now seeing ranges emerge that can match the MK's for detail retrieval, and better them for delicacy and finesse. some will say that I would say this as we're no longer MK dealers, but if that was really the case, I'd have said this two years ago when our partnership ended. Why would I wait two years just to say I've found something better? I've genuinely wanted to find something that didn't even have to better them, they only had to sound as good. Finally, I've found something. Maybe two manufacturers actually, as one stunned me late last year with their new speakers in an AV setup, and that wasn't even with the dedicated centre...v1c said:I respect what you have to say David...... but you not keen on MK now are you ?.
I appreciate that v1c, and that suggestion still stands. I was only pointing out that the performance difference between hi-fi and AV speakers has changed recently, so it's not so cut and driedI was really just offering an alternative suggestion..... is there any truth in Onkyo using MK when testing/desgining AV as suggested on the MK sound website ?.
Sorry, I didn't see this - do you have a link? (thread subscription please WHF!!)On a different subject I asked you a question on subthing interesting (two actually) have you noticed ? you not answered.
I personally never got on that well with the 950's. They sounded good, but I always preferred the 150's,and even the 750's.Greenblood said:By room shaking I do want good bass, but also clarity and balance. I dont want flabby bass! I want the room to really feel like there are explosions going off when being shown in the film. I want to blow away pals that come round for a beer and wach a film. I have been recommended the MK 950 before, but as they are stand mounted I thought I would see if there are floorstanders that can match or better them.
Stopping sound reflection is a good idea in theory, but be careful not to deaden the room too much. This can completely rob the life out of a room, and it can get to a point where it doesn't matter how good a system you put in it, it'll never sound good. The deader the room is, the more powerful the system needs to be because there's so much absorption going on. Wide dispersion speakers would be needed too - they generally are for AV anyway - narrower dispersion speakers will make the system sound like you've got five or seven separate channels rather than a soundfield going on.I have been recommended the Onkyo 3009 or 5009 so will choose which Evers most suitable. I want to make sure the room is well filled with sound, the walls will all be clad with 50mm insulation rockwool behind a black fabric, so will sound pretty dead. The ceiling will be 1/2" ply with the same black material stapled to them, the floor, concrete with thick underlay and carpet.
Greenblood said:Sorry David, forgot to answer you about the4k thing. How will the revolution affect my choice now? Am I right in thinking that 4k is going to take a few years to become mainstream? I'd be looking at getting 5-10years before any serious upgrades...
FrankHarveyHiFi said:Greenblood said:Sorry David, forgot to answer you about the4k thing. How will the revolution affect my choice now? Am I right in thinking that 4k is going to take a few years to become mainstream? I'd be looking at getting 5-10years before any serious upgrades...
In an AV system, speakers and amplification generally don't change all that much, and choosing well now will allow you to get a good 10 years out of them if necessary. Processors and the processing sections of AV amps get updated every year, and knowing a good dealer in this respect generally has benefits for the regular customer (I can't really say too much on here about that). As it stands, there hasn't really been much change in processors since the current HD codecs from Bluray were catered for, but now we're on the 4K2K doorstep, this will bring new sound formats that will accompany the new 4K Bluray format, supposedly available some time next year. I would say we're roughly about 2 years away from £5,000 4K2K home cinema projectors. If this is something you want to get into, then it's worth taking into consideration. If you're not bothered, or wouldnt be bothered by it for another 5 years, then forget everything I said about it and just get a system and enjoy yourself
FrankHarveyHiFi said:I personally never got on that well with the 950's. They sounded good, but I always preferred the 150's,and even the 750's.Greenblood said:By room shaking I do want good bass, but also clarity and balance. I dont want flabby bass! I want the room to really feel like there are explosions going off when being shown in the film. I want to blow away pals that come round for a beer and wach a film. I have been recommended the MK 950 before, but as they are stand mounted I thought I would see if there are floorstanders that can match or better them.
Nobody wants flabby bass. It might impress some people, but the novelty of oodles of soft warm bass soon wear off. I would generally look at sealed subs, as these tend to naturally offer a more even in room response than ported ones, but because of this, won't quite reach down as deep. It's partly down to quality as well, but sealed subs offer greater control, and therefore, greater dexterity. A loose sounding sub can lack punch, and therefore detail, and sound soft.
Stopping sound reflection is a good idea in theory, but be careful not to deaden the room too much. This can completely rob the life out of a room, and it can get to a point where it doesn't matter how good a system you put in it, it'll never sound good. The deader the room is, the more powerful the system needs to be because there's so much absorption going on. Wide dispersion speakers would be needed too - they generally are for AV anyway - narrower dispersion speakers will make the system sound like you've got five or seven separate channels rather than a soundfield going on.I have been recommended the Onkyo 3009 or 5009 so will choose which Evers most suitable. I want to make sure the room is well filled with sound, the walls will all be clad with 50mm insulation rockwool behind a black fabric, so will sound pretty dead. The ceiling will be 1/2" ply with the same black material stapled to them, the floor, concrete with thick underlay and carpet.
I would allow a little bit of reflection in certain places. If you play a little mini system or iPod dock in a heavily furnished living room, it won't go very loud, and if it does, the volume will be turned up quite high. Play the same thing in your kitchen at the same volume, and the resulting sound is much more room filling, and it'll sound louder too. I'm not saying kit your AV room out as a kitchen, but if you take that extreme, you might be able to see where I'm going with it. Sound travels when it's reflected, but it doesn't when it's dampened. Finding the right compromise there will help you reach higher volumes without pushing the equipment so hard, and playing everything so loud.
I would probably need to see some pics of the room, and get some more accurate measurements for better recommendations, but if you're aiming for the sound I have in my head based on your description (if you follow that!), then I'm afraid the current budget won't quite be sufficient. Headroom is the key word here.
Greenblood said:Hmm I'm not catching your drift here methinks! I want a good system now, mid to high end I'd say. Was thinking of a Sony vpl95, but could be persuaded by a Sony 30 which will free up some more budget for amp and speakers. Was thinking 2-3 k on amp and 4-7k on speakers though I'd really like 7.1. Oppo93 or95 for source