Vladimir said:drummerman said:C'mon ... this has all happened before without to many objections. EB Acoustics, Acoustic Energy and others have frequently posted on here, in a friendly manner, indirectly (or not so indirectly) promoting their individual products without slagging off others. They have not been stopped by the powers that are but slowly just stopped posting here.
I think it's great that WHF acts as a patron and hasn't obstructed small hi-fi entrepreneurs in UK from growing on this forum. I didn't mind that young designer from Audiosmile promoting his Kickstarter campaign for his new BBC miniature speakers. But the moral spetsnaz were quick on the gun to call it a pyramid scheme and early signs of anarchy and lawless society. *crazy*
Esra said:Which speakers do you have?Which amp did you used until now?What is the problem with your system?
drummerman said:chebby said:No point in continuing to bang the drum. IQ will always be 'Boggit' and he is now the resident 'plucky little entrepreneur' fighting the big boys against all the odds. The fact that he is an importer / distributor / loudspeaker manufacturer does not count because he is really just 'one of us'. His profits (if any) are just supporting his hobby, so are not really 'bad profits' like everyone else's. (They are all slavering jackals and not nice chaps like our Boggit.)
The Abrahamsen thing is just to help another fellow altruist survive and to help ordinary people against the 'monster' of competing hi-fi companies (rip-off merchants and liars). No profit motive i'm sure.
If Paul Darwin or Charles Brennan came on here to actively promote their brands against others mentioned here (Audiolab in this instance) then obviously there would be no comparison. They only do it for money and it would be obscene.
C'mon ... this has all happened before without to many objections. EB Acoustics, Acoustic Energy and others have frequently posted on here, in a friendly manner, indirectly (or not so indirectly) promoting their individual products without slagging off others. They have not been stopped by the powers that are but slowly just stopped posting here.
Whilst I too get fed up by flavor of the month product threads (think scandinavian monoliths, at present at least) they are rarely bought up by the manufacturers/distributors, more so by satisfied customers.
Why not?
I personally have no problem with it. Actually, I would like to see more manufacturers, Dealers, Distributors participate to break up the boredom of cable arguments (or contributing to them )
Esra said:Ok if you find your top end a bit too bright i would suggest you the ncores out of both (especially if you have to decide blind) which are silky smooth but also very detailed,like a combination of a very precise A/B amp with the smooth touch of an very good valve amp .The 8200MB are more exciting at the top end in comparsion (not harsh or bright) and tend to very little warmth in the middle band and have punchier bass but always in control;I would say they could be a bit much with very agile/dynamic and exciting speakers as the 8200MB tend in that direction although i would declare them still pretty neutral in comparison to other amps in their price range..Ncores are really very neutral over full band with smooth touch in the upper band and absolute control over bass which can be a bit dry with some speakers and they have higher resolution in all departements incl. bass,relaxed and effortless presentation.Can´t go wrong with them imo..
Looked at the measurements of your speakers.I would go with the ncores if I were you.Could be a little bass heavy with the 8200MB and if you think your system is bright although measurements show that your speakers should not be bright at all.
Esra said:No you can also split the power supply for two modules but it is recommended to use one power supply for each modul to get best out of them.If I were you i would really go for real mono setup via XLR,nothing to save much here.For internal wiring to the binding post try to use the same cable as your speaker cables.Even better if you don´t use binding post and wire your speaker cable directly to the modules.After seeing the hardware you use i think you will have no problem to build them.Ghent Audio (google for it) have nice predrilled aluminum cases for the build with reasonable price.
DocG said:Esra said:No you can also split the power supply for two modules but it is recommended to use one power supply for each modul to get best out of them.If I were you i would really go for real mono setup via XLR,nothing to save much here.For internal wiring to the binding post try to use the same cable as your speaker cables.Even better if you don´t use binding post and wire your speaker cable directly to the modules.After seeing the hardware you use i think you will have no problem to build them.Ghent Audio (google for it) have nice predrilled aluminum cases for the build with reasonable price.
If you listen at moderate levels, a single SMPS-600 will do. But then, you might not use the amp to its full potential (and that will start nagging!)... A SMPS600 for each NC400 is best, though two NC400s with a single SMPS1200A400 will probably work just as well (and at lower cost -- but with higher idle power IIRC). Ghent has predrilled cases for that combination too.
As the NC400 has such a low output impedance, Hypex advise to keep the speaker cable as short (and as thick) as possible, which might be another reason to go for monoblocks, and thus two separate power supplies.
iQ Speakers said:I know DocG has given me his view before, but ESRA do you have any thoughts on the UcD180 and the 400 as a cheaper alternative to put together a decent amp that i can sell for a reasonable price? Is there a source for circuit diagrams out there. Would really like a preamp to make it into an Integrated amp.
Jota180 said:IMO a very clear disclaimer of some sorts would strike a balance better than an outright blanket ban or a free for all.
Esra said:DocG said:Esra said:No you can also split the power supply for two modules but it is recommended to use one power supply for each modul to get best out of them.If I were you i would really go for real mono setup via XLR,nothing to save much here.For internal wiring to the binding post try to use the same cable as your speaker cables.Even better if you don´t use binding post and wire your speaker cable directly to the modules.After seeing the hardware you use i think you will have no problem to build them.Ghent Audio (google for it) have nice predrilled aluminum cases for the build with reasonable price.
If you listen at moderate levels, a single SMPS-600 will do. But then, you might not use the amp to its full potential (and that will start nagging!)... A SMPS600 for each NC400 is best, though two NC400s with a single SMPS1200A400 will probably work just as well (and at lower cost -- but with higher idle power IIRC). Ghent has predrilled cases for that combination too.
As the NC400 has such a low output impedance, Hypex advise to keep the speaker cable as short (and as thick) as possible, which might be another reason to go for monoblocks, and thus two separate power supplies.
Well the SMPS 600 is specifically designed for the nc400 and instructions recommend one power supply for each modul to get the best results with ncores.I don´t know you but for me it is not worth (money) to go an other route than the designer intended and try to be smarter because i am not at this field.I don´t like words like probably etc... either.All I can say the amps are worth every penny.
Vladimir said:Speaking of budget watts, a good option for $400 is to get 2 Behringer A500 and have them each bridged. The result is very potent 2x200W RMS in 8 ohms. I'm currious how much would 2x200W of N-Core power amp kit would cost in total including some cheap steel enclosure?
iQ Speakers said:I would then hope to compare the quality with the NC400 and see if I can produce a Sexy looking cased Hypex Integrated amp for reasonable money ie around £600-999 mark.