3D for philips 9000 series

[admin_exported]

Will the add-on 3D pack for the 2010 '8000' and '9000' philips tv's be compatable with the current 2009 '8000' and '9000' televisions?

This is the 9705 model for 2010

 

[Andrew Everard]

i think not, as the TV also has to be able to handle the 3D signal input and process it.

 

[Clare Newsome]

I doubt it very much, as those sets aren't 3D ready in terms of processing. We'll ask, though!

 

[Clare Newsome]

Jinx!

 

[Anonymous]

thanks for asking.

 

[Deleted member 2457]

This wireless transmitter will it look like the one philips used on one of there old 42 inch models?

No idea on pricing?

That philips tv above is that what they look like?

Thanks

 

[Anonymous]

Any plans to expand the services offered via NET TV for existing sets?

 

[Clare Newsome]

You can read everything we know so far about the 2010 Philips range here. Already more info there re internet functionality.

It's only the first afternoon of the conference, so i'm sure we'll find out far more over the next 24 hours - please be patient while we get some quality time with Philips UK people, who'll have far better idea of specific availability, pricing, UK features etc.

 

[Deleted member 2457]

I hope it does not look like that where's the all piano black gone, more silver and whites coming out.

 

[Andrew Everard]

gel:This wireless transmitter will it look like the one philips used on one of there old 42 inch models?

No idea on pricing?

That philips tv above is that what they look like?

Golly, I think gel's about to explode! Calm down, dear, it's only a telly...

 

[Andy Clough]

PhilPhilips:Any plans to expand the services offered via NET TV for existing sets?

The info we have so far is that Philips has done deals with broadcasters in other European countries to expand the Net TV service, but not yet UK. Whether the expanded services will work on existing Net TVs we'll have to ascertain.

 

[Anonymous]

This is the 8605 model

 

[Deleted member 2457]

Andrew Everard:gel:This wireless transmitter will it look like the one philips used on one of there old 42 inch models?

No idea on pricing?

That philips tv above is that what they look like?

Golly, I think gel's about to explode! Calm down, dear, it's only a telly...

I'm

I don't where people expect you to put these transmitter boxes?

 

[Andrew Everard]

NOTE FROM MODS - please don't post such enormous pictures; please resize to max 400 pixels wide before posting

 

[Anonymous]

Thanks Andy

 

[Andrew Everard]

gel:I'm

I don't where people expect you to put these transmitter boxes?

, but I shall resist...

 

[Deleted member 2457]

I will have my blu ray player, my sky hd box, and a wireless transmitter box all piled onto each other, no room for a 91.

 

[Andrew Everard]

gel:

I will have my blu ray player, my sky hd box, and a wireless transmitter box all piled onto each other

That's really not a good idea if you want the best performance.

 

[Andy Clough]

For those who missed it earlier in the day, our coverage of the Philips press launch continues into the evening, with Mr Editor Dawes reporting live from the TV workshop. Find out more about Philips's 2010 TV range, including 3D LED models.

 

[Deleted member 2457]

Andrew Everard:

gel:

I will have my blu ray player, my sky hd box, and a wireless transmitter box all piled onto each other

That's really not a good idea if you want the best performance.

What the 91? or them all piled onto of each other?

Thanks

 

[Andrew Everard]

The piling. You'll note I left the reference to 'the 91' out of my quote above.

 

[Deleted member 2457]

Andrew Everard:The piling. You'll note I left the reference to 'the 91' out of my quote above.

Ah, thanks, what choice do you have know?

 

[Anonymous]

so is the 9705 the same as the 9704 but just have 3d veiwing ?

 

[ear]

On thing I dont understant.If in youtube I can see some movies in 3d why cant they be sseen on a normal lcd screen?

 

[Anonymous]

Andrew Everard:NOTE FROM MODS - please don't post such enormous pictures; please resize to max 400 pixels wide before posting

This is not a questioning of the moderation but just a thought...isn't it more important that the source picture is less than 400px wide rather than the display size? Because if the pictures is say 10MP and being resized the 400px it is still downloading the full 10MP pixel and your browser is resizing it to 400px, which is essentially defeating the purpose of resizing it as the bandwidth is still being wasted (because, really it isn't a big deal if the picture is displayed bigger than 400px wide if bandwidth isn't an issue).