True Blue:
"trying to appear more intelligent , as you are endevouring to do , by wording things as you are , and trying to catch me out , is making you look a little silly , i would respectfully suggest ??"
This is the offensive part. More intelligent than what? you? why do you feel the requirement to question my intelligence, trying to catch you out? again no, you asked for a debate I gave my side of the argument backed up with physical laws, and expected you, as an intelligent person to respond in kind.
first you said
Maxflinn, I await your counter arguements to Faradays and Lenz laws, I will be watching New Scientist with baited breath.................
then you said
Please.......you started a debate, on which you changed your main focus mid way through. I have presented my initial assessment and theories to back it up, now I await your educated and informed response..........
then you said
So when the going gets tough and someone actually stands up and starts to defend his beliefs based upon observation and theory (also called science) you resort to childish comedy images.
Its a shame really..........
then
I now bow out due to yet another ignorance of scientific argument / counter with the tendency towards childish humour and teenage wit.....
then i gave my interpretation of the above line of posting , as you trying to draw me into a scientific debate , which i assumed you believed you would be qualified to win , asking me to disprove scientifically , what you cannot prove scientifically , or in laymans terms ?? not being able to explain why something doesnt work , does not prove that it does ..
the childish humour and teenage wit , as you described it , was more of an attempt at levity on my part , which , again i respectfully suggest , most people got , apart from you ??