Tidal Royalties No Better Than Spotify

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the What HiFi community: the world's leading independent guide to buying and owning hi-fi and home entertainment products.

DCarmi

Well-known member
Why was the owner of Spotify thinking of buying a premier league football club not long ago if he's not earning any money ?
There is a difference between company profit and CEO remuneration. Companies will often flog shares on the prospect of future profit and can make a killing. Basically hedge funds, pension companies and the like will bet on a company being successful, at least for a while. Usually companies with what is called First Mover Advantage (Spotify in this case) are the best bet.

This does mean that Spotify need to keep buying infrastructure, "stock" (e.g. Podcasts etc) and employing good staff to ensure their service is better appreciated than the competitors. This costs a load of dosh. Not least the licences paid to the labels.

Spotify's biggest risk are companies like Apple, Amazon a d Google who can afford to run these competitor services at a loss because they have other strings to their bow. Spotify is pretty much a one product company. If their product fails, the company fails. I would not be surprised if Apple and Amazon were paying less in licence fees than Spotify.

Netflix would be another company with similar problems to Spotify. How to expand the company to compete with the likes of Amazon, Apple and Disney who are awash with spare cash? You can put you prices up, like Netflix and hope that people don't leave.

Besides if Bezos really wanted a football team, the cost of buying it to him would be like us thinking of buying a bag of sweets!
 
  • Like
Reactions: manicm

manicm

Well-known member
There is a difference between company profit and CEO remuneration. Companies will often flog shares on the prospect of future profit and can make a killing. Basically hedge funds, pension companies and the like will bet on a company being successful, at least for a while. Usually companies with what is called First Mover Advantage (Spotify in this case) are the best bet.

This does mean that Spotify need to keep buying infrastructure, "stock" (e.g. Podcasts etc) and employing good staff to ensure their service is better appreciated than the competitors. This costs a load of dosh. Not least the licences paid to the labels.

Spotify's biggest risk are companies like Apple, Amazon a d Google who can afford to run these competitor services at a loss because they have other strings to their bow. Spotify is pretty much a one product company. If their product fails, the company fails. I would not be surprised if Apple and Amazon were paying less in licence fees than Spotify.

Netflix would be another company with similar problems to Spotify. How to expand the company to compete with the likes of Amazon, Apple and Disney who are awash with spare cash? You can put you prices up, like Netflix and hope that people don't leave.

Besides if Bezos really wanted a football team, the cost of buying it to him would be like us thinking of buying a bag of sweets!

With no free tier I doubt Apple Music is running at a loss, and if they are it won't be for long. And with their high audio quality offerings they're certainly bullish.
 

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts