Things I hate about Hifi

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the What HiFi community: the world's leading independent guide to buying and owning hi-fi and home entertainment products.
You said that this is the only way that things could work - and unless you've heard every other combination (which you've haven't), you cannot say 'only' way. But back on topic please or rules will be applied.
Also, currently, there aren't any speaker plugs that are registered as a universal electrical connector, for connecting speakers to amplifiers, and are a Standard connector that's issued by a governing body in the industry, for mass adoption, like the RCA and XLR connectors already have.
 
I didn't see him project and kind of lifestyle in the 3 odd years I've been watching his videos. Like where are the gold chains and Ferraris? He states what the products cost, so should WHF also refrain?

WHF and all magazines are going to review products that many cannot afford. So I don't understand your comments at all.

His lifestyle is his lifestyle, as are ours.
Well different people perceive things in different ways.

You don't have to wear a load of bling and roll out of a Lamborghini to project a certain image, and my perception was always that he tried to convey a quietly confident sense of wealth. But whatever - the main point for me is that sure WHF and other sources will review some high-end kit, but they won't typically compare that against more modestly priced options.

The Huff guy to me always seemed to say "Yeah the WiiM product is great value at $200 and - coughs - IF I COMPARE IT TO MY $25,000 STREAMER, it punches pretty well". Felt to me like there was always a flex in the videos.

There's a lot of reading between the lines 😆 Let's just say I'm not compatible with him but I totally accept that we all see things in different ways.
 
Well different people perceive things in different ways.

You don't have to wear a load of bling and roll out of a Lamborghini to project a certain image, and my perception was always that he tried to convey a quietly confident sense of wealth. But whatever - the main point for me is that sure WHF and other sources will review some high-end kit, but they won't typically compare that against more modestly priced options.

The Huff guy to me always seemed to say "Yeah the WiiM product is great value at $200 and - coughs - IF I COMPARE IT TO MY $25,000 STREAMER, it punches pretty well". Felt to me like there was always a flex in the videos.

There's a lot of reading between the lines 😆 Let's just say I'm not compatible with him but I totally accept that we all see things in different ways.

You obviously did not watch his latest video entirely, because for better or worse he explains his financial situation. I actually appreciate the fact that he says things like 'if I compare so and so'. He's not a professional reviewer, he's not claiming to be.
 
You obviously did not watch his latest video entirely, because for better or worse he explains his financial situation. I actually appreciate the fact that he says things like 'if I compare so and so'. He's not a professional reviewer, he's not claiming to be.
I did watch it all and look - we aren't going to agree on this one, and that's fine.

I don't think the end to the video contradicts anything I've said and it didn't really make me empathise any more / less with his situation.
 
Those are still radio music boxes in listening for hours together, like a background music playback at a hotel. Unlike hi-end audio setups at home that fully engulfs the listener in enjoying the ultimate audio experience for the whole track length, in full resolution, especially Hi-Res albums.
Well then we clearly have very different perceptions of realistic home listening. 🙂
 
There aren’t any high current air/water/insulation cooled cables that are mainstream, in connecting speakers to amplifiers, with a single copper extruded tube.
And so buying the whole audio system from the same brand with all the components including cables is the future, but are not currently sold to customers.
 
... the fact that 'Hifi' is mostly targeted at middle to high aged males. The average show visit will be ample proof. It's like god's waiting room in a male only club and quite a sad reflection on the hobby.

Head-fi on the other hand, whilst still mostly male orientated, at least attracts a largely younger audience.

Then there's 'home-fi'. These are life style systems which integrate nicely into the average home without being shrines to Hifi, taking up most of a living room. This is where females come more into the equation and to me, that is a good thing.

Some traditional hifi brands are catching on to it (to the dismay of die hard hifi enthusiasts which just can not cope with the trend). Others are still dabbling in traditional legacy stuff hoping their demographic will live a few more years.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Jasonovich
Youtube videos reviewing a relatively budget product ... then some idiot replying in comments that he just bought the same manufacturers top product at x times the cost stating how much he likes it without context. What is the bloody point?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Friesiansam
All-in-one Streaming Amplifiers, don’t have a built in expandable SSD storage to download Hi-Res albums either from the brand’s dedicated downloading App for searching and downloading albums that’s encrypted and secure or externally over the internet like in HDTracks.com.
Currently, one would need to connect via Ethernet to a NAS or server or play via removable storage devices like USB’s, instead of the Streaming Amplifier’s internal storage.

Then Hi-Res monthly steaming services will become obsolete. As downloading albums is even more personal than just streaming.
 
There are many reasons why that's impractical and I'll start with licensing. I can't see a world where an actual Hi-Fi manufacturer wants to get involved with that at all.

I think you're stretching the realms of possibility with your dream vision of a single manufacturer providing everything from end to end.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Al ears
There are many reasons why that's impractical and I'll start with licensing. I can't see a world where an actual Hi-Fi manufacturer wants to get involved with that at all.

I think you're stretching the realms of possibility with your dream vision of a single manufacturer providing everything from end to end.

It's absolutely not far fetched. Licensing apart, technically it should be easy to implement. To be able to save to a drive is nothing.
 
It's absolutely not far fetched. Licensing apart, technically it should be easy to implement. To be able to save to a drive is nothing.
Oh technically it's a doddle but "licensing apart" is doing a lot of legwork here - it's a fundamental requirement of the ability to distribute music and I personally think it wouldn't be commercially viable for each manufacturer to license music.

Current services like TIDAL, Qobuz, Spotify etc. work because they are hardware agnostic and so are open to a much broader user base. As soon as you create a technological barrier to the breadth of that distribution, all economies of scale are diluted and it likely drives up the cost per subscription.
 
Oh technically it's a doddle but "licensing apart" is doing a lot of legwork here - it's a fundamental requirement of the ability to distribute music and I personally think it wouldn't be commercially viable for each manufacturer to license music.

Current services like TIDAL, Qobuz, Spotify etc. work because they are hardware agnostic and so are open to a much broader user base. As soon as you create a technological barrier to the breadth of that distribution, all economies of scale are diluted and it likely drives up the cost per subscription.
Hi-Res music albums searching and purchasing is a thing really over streaming! ☺️
 
Oh technically it's a doddle but "licensing apart" is doing a lot of legwork here - it's a fundamental requirement of the ability to distribute music and I personally think it wouldn't be commercially viable for each manufacturer to license music.

Current services like TIDAL, Qobuz, Spotify etc. work because they are hardware agnostic and so are open to a much broader user base. As soon as you create a technological barrier to the breadth of that distribution, all economies of scale are diluted and it likely drives up the cost per subscription.

I need to remind you that YouTube Music, Apple Music, Tidal and Spotify all enable downloads on cellphones for offline listening. To enable this on hifi components will not break their agnosticism, but admittedly will require perhaps some custom API work, but I still don't see that as a big deal. And actually licensing will be a non issue cos the music can be downloaded onto a non user accessible small disk drive of the component, to disable external transfer.
 
And actually licensing will be a non issue cos the music can be downloaded onto a non user accessible small disk drive of the component, to disable external transfer.
Even that surely still requires a license? All those other services you listed will hold the relevant licenses and rights

My understanding was that the poster was hoping for the Hi-Fi manufacturers to provide EVERYTHING. If not and it's effectively just a Connect type API through to a separate vendor who already has the rights, then it's a non-issue.
 

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts