jjbomber
Well-known member
I look forward to it.Maybe somebody can start a thread about the things we love about HiFi. Methinks this is going to be like the Liechtenstein book of heroes! 😩
I look forward to it.Maybe somebody can start a thread about the things we love about HiFi. Methinks this is going to be like the Liechtenstein book of heroes! 😩
Also, currently, there aren't any speaker plugs that are registered as a universal electrical connector, for connecting speakers to amplifiers, and are a Standard connector that's issued by a governing body in the industry, for mass adoption, like the RCA and XLR connectors already have.You said that this is the only way that things could work - and unless you've heard every other combination (which you've haven't), you cannot say 'only' way. But back on topic please or rules will be applied.
Well different people perceive things in different ways.I didn't see him project and kind of lifestyle in the 3 odd years I've been watching his videos. Like where are the gold chains and Ferraris? He states what the products cost, so should WHF also refrain?
WHF and all magazines are going to review products that many cannot afford. So I don't understand your comments at all.
His lifestyle is his lifestyle, as are ours.
Well different people perceive things in different ways.
You don't have to wear a load of bling and roll out of a Lamborghini to project a certain image, and my perception was always that he tried to convey a quietly confident sense of wealth. But whatever - the main point for me is that sure WHF and other sources will review some high-end kit, but they won't typically compare that against more modestly priced options.
The Huff guy to me always seemed to say "Yeah the WiiM product is great value at $200 and - coughs - IF I COMPARE IT TO MY $25,000 STREAMER, it punches pretty well". Felt to me like there was always a flex in the videos.
There's a lot of reading between the lines 😆 Let's just say I'm not compatible with him but I totally accept that we all see things in different ways.
You might re-evaluate that opinion if you saw his other channel. I think he spoke to the Queen in one.
I did watch it all and look - we aren't going to agree on this one, and that's fine.You obviously did not watch his latest video entirely, because for better or worse he explains his financial situation. I actually appreciate the fact that he says things like 'if I compare so and so'. He's not a professional reviewer, he's not claiming to be.
Well then we clearly have very different perceptions of realistic home listening. 🙂Those are still radio music boxes in listening for hours together, like a background music playback at a hotel. Unlike hi-end audio setups at home that fully engulfs the listener in enjoying the ultimate audio experience for the whole track length, in full resolution, especially Hi-Res albums.
And Hi-Fi music listening on Hi-end audio setups at home is one among them.Well then we clearly have very different perceptions of realistic home listening. 🙂
There are many reasons why that's impractical and I'll start with licensing. I can't see a world where an actual Hi-Fi manufacturer wants to get involved with that at all.
I think you're stretching the realms of possibility with your dream vision of a single manufacturer providing everything from end to end.
Oh technically it's a doddle but "licensing apart" is doing a lot of legwork here - it's a fundamental requirement of the ability to distribute music and I personally think it wouldn't be commercially viable for each manufacturer to license music.It's absolutely not far fetched. Licensing apart, technically it should be easy to implement. To be able to save to a drive is nothing.
Hi-Res music albums searching and purchasing is a thing really over streaming! ☺️Oh technically it's a doddle but "licensing apart" is doing a lot of legwork here - it's a fundamental requirement of the ability to distribute music and I personally think it wouldn't be commercially viable for each manufacturer to license music.
Current services like TIDAL, Qobuz, Spotify etc. work because they are hardware agnostic and so are open to a much broader user base. As soon as you create a technological barrier to the breadth of that distribution, all economies of scale are diluted and it likely drives up the cost per subscription.
Oh technically it's a doddle but "licensing apart" is doing a lot of legwork here - it's a fundamental requirement of the ability to distribute music and I personally think it wouldn't be commercially viable for each manufacturer to license music.
Current services like TIDAL, Qobuz, Spotify etc. work because they are hardware agnostic and so are open to a much broader user base. As soon as you create a technological barrier to the breadth of that distribution, all economies of scale are diluted and it likely drives up the cost per subscription.
Yes. And how many of those services are directly provided end-to-end by Hi-Fi manufacturers?Hi-Res music albums searching and purchasing is a thing really over streaming! ☺️
Even that surely still requires a license? All those other services you listed will hold the relevant licenses and rightsAnd actually licensing will be a non issue cos the music can be downloaded onto a non user accessible small disk drive of the component, to disable external transfer.