Vladimir said:MeanandGreen said:I see the benefit to all of the popular formats, I see no point in dissing one over the other. They each have a place IMO.
I hated rewinding cassettes. I hated how they sounded. The day I bought my first CDP I was extatic and eventually trashed all my tape players. The only thing I liked about them was the option to pirate music and make mix tapes for listening on the go with my walkman. I was also very very happy when I got a CD-R drive on my PC and my first discman. And when torrents became popular I dropped everything and just hoarded FLACs for free. I had a vinyl phase over 10 years ago because I was heavily into electronic music, and that genre was hot for buying new vinyl and owning good TTs. When I lowered my interest in electronica, I sold my vinyl collection and gear. When MOG came out, followed by other streaming services, including Youtube, I eventually dropped keeping any form of copy of music, now I just subscribe to Tidal. I can have any music I want in any resolution for free, but I prefer the convenience and lack of clutter by just paying a streaming subscription.
For me past media formats have absolutely no room in my life. I only went step back with vinyl since I never experienced it as a kid, so it looked cool, for a while. I'll continue to follow the most convenient way of enjoying music. I'm not drawn by the idea that I should save money to buy music in physical format simply because it is less instantly gratifying. I spent plenty of money on CDs, cassettes and LPs, on a very limited budget as an adolescent and student, you can imagine, and I feel zero appeal to go back to that ritual. If I don't find some music enjoyable, I don't need starvation to make it more appealing to me, I just don't listen to it. I move on searching for new music that will interest me without a crutch. I will never enjoy music like I did when I was 16, and I've come to peace with that.
MrReaper182 said:Get the right cassette deck and cassettes can sound great. Some people do comparisons between good cassette decks and bad one's one youbube and you can hear the difference (even with youtube's compressed sound). Those really good cassette decks sound awesome.
The_Lhc said:Comeback? Tape backup never went away. Disk backup is all very well but you can't send a 40PB data domain array to offsite storage in the back of a van and I've yet to see a site to site deduplication process that actually works as advertised. Tape is still king.
The_Lhc said:Comeback? Tape backup never went away. Disk backup is all very well but you can't send a 40PB data domain array to offsite storage in the back of a van and I've yet to see a site to site deduplication process that actually works as advertised. Tape is still king.
My favourite recording of The Planets is the Adrian Boult one on EMI. Wonderful playing and, despite its age, outstanding recording quality too.Covenanter said:I've had the Dutoit since it was released in 1987 and I've never been moved to buy another version. It won the Gramophone Engineering award when it came out and it is a very fine recording indeed which is matched by the playing.iMark said:In the early and mid 1980s Decca made terrific digital recordings of the Orchestre Symphonique de Montréal under Charles Dutoit. They recorded the Planets in 1986, released in 1987.
http://www.amazon.com/Holst-The-Planets-Gustav/dp/B0000041S7/ref=pd_bxgy_15_img_2?ie=UTF8&refRID=1TWCKSSN72BEQ33DTMK4
I'm not the only one who really likes this recording.
http://www.talkclassical.com/5739-best-recording-planets.html
It's available on Spotify and so is the Von Karajan. IMHO the Decca sound from 1987 is quite a bit better than the DG from 1981. The comparison is a bit difficult, because the DG seems to have been remastered at a much louder level.
Another really good one, from 2003, is Colin Davis with the London Symphony Orchestra.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Holst-Planets-Gustav/dp/B000063DQJ/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1453731213&sr=8-2&keywords=Holst+Planets+LSO
Chris