richardw42
New member
- May 2, 2010
- 299
- 0
- 0
S*** This thread makes me want to scream.
Whf, I had to edit this post I thought the filter would sort it.
Whf, I had to edit this post I thought the filter would sort it.
Why? Explain please or is that not wiserichardw42 said:S*** This thread makes me want to scream.
Whf, I had to edit this post I thought the filter would sort it.
I sort of feel the same. It's depressing that people will mess about with silly tweaks which must be about 8000% profit for the maker when there's so many meaningful things you can do within this hobby. Before spending hundreds of pounds on some 'final' tweak, have you got a system that measures within a few db across the frequency range ensuring the optimum speaker and seating positions? I spent hours and hours on my system measuring and tweaking yet others ignore what's important and just line the pockets or someone selling 50p worth of stainless steel in a fancy packet. If this product actually worked you could simply make a before and after recording to prove it but that will never happen of course - for some magic reason its effects cannot possibly be recorded. Not all directed at the OP - I don't know what his setup is actually like but it's indicative of 'audophiles' in general and why they're laughed at.richardw42 said:S*** This thread makes me want to scream.
According to this, it looks like your dealer is on the right track: http://www.theaudiobeat.com/equipment/stillpoints.htmWomaz said:problem em is I have two sources and def not paying out for 2 lots of theseCnoEvil said:I agree with David (and BigH).......these things should start under the Source and then work towards the speakers.
I am also just following what my dealer said ........thanks for the input though
I also read that you should us ethem under the speakers first, think thats from Stillpoints too?CnoEvil said:According to this, it looks like your dealer is on the right track: http://www.theaudiobeat.com/equipment/stillpoints.htmWomaz said:problem em is I have two sources and def not paying out for 2 lots of theseCnoEvil said:I agree with David (and BigH).......these things should start under the Source and then work towards the speakers.
I am also just following what my dealer said ........thanks for the input though
"After the AC supply, your order of application should simply follow the potential energy in the system: power amps, external power supplies, preamp, source components -- in that order. "
Me too.richardw42 said:S*** This thread makes me want to scream.
It's funny because I have always made my own mind up about thingspauln said:Me too.richardw42 said:S*** This thread makes me want to scream.
The fact that some people spend that sort of money on a product like this is verging on obscene and the fact that some people actually believe the claims made about the product leaves me speechless.
Sorry if that upsets anyone but that's the way I feel about it.
Textbook stuff. Well done.Womaz said:but the girlfrirnd who is a lot younger heard a difference straight away. As did my daughter who is only 21 so hearing should be better![]()
I'm glad you tried it and made your own assessment.Womaz said:I left them in my system for over a week, and then took them away. it was then that I noticed the difference. The music sounded a little dull in comparison.
So they have been purchased and I think they are a "tweak" that is affordable and cost effective.
Yes it is bonkers and trust me I did not really want it to make a difference as it seems preposterous. It alos irks me that I pay 2.5k for an amp and that i can then improve it with such a simple tool.CnoEvil said:I'm glad you tried it and made your own assessment.Womaz said:I left them in my system for over a week, and then took them away. it was then that I noticed the difference. The music sounded a little dull in comparison.
So they have been purchased and I think they are a "tweak" that is affordable and cost effective.
It is slightly bonkers that it has such a noticeable effect; which is why people who haven't heard it, will queue up to tell you are mistaken.
I'm always amused that people like these are never able to express their skepticism without the use of the words "snake oil" or "placebo"cheeseboy said:Placebo....If a 10k system can sound better with a few bits of metal lobbed under t'amp.....
So what words that have the same meaning would you suggest? I think that "snake oil" sums it up perfectly, albeit not literally.hifikrazy said:I'm always amused that people like these are never able to express their skepticism without the use of the words "snake oil" or "placebo"cheeseboy said:Placebo....If a 10k system can sound better with a few bits of metal lobbed under t'amp.....
you are aware about how strong the placebo effect is aren't you, or is it you that is skeptical of the placebo effect?hifikrazy said:I'm always amused that people like these are never able to express their skepticism without the use of the words "snake oil" or "placebo"cheeseboy said:Placebo....If a 10k system can sound better with a few bits of metal lobbed under t'amp.....