johnnyjazz:Darren Heal:
Pound for Pound, a pair of standmounts, on decent stands, will probably deliver more quality than floorstanders, simply due to more money being available for manufacturers to spend on the speaker cones and / or crossovers etc. than on the cabinets. HOWEVER, if you factor in the £100 or so a decent pair of stands is going to cost, the financial difference begins to evaporate. Also, with kids or drunken party revellers likely to knock stand mounts off their stands, floorstanders have their advantages.
Good floorstanders have their own aesthetics, and the Misson 752 and 753 speakers, for example, had superbly crafed rosewood veneered cabinets.
Finally, I too am in the liking to "feel" bass camp, so it's floorstanders all the way for me. That might change if I ever find myself living in a student bedsit again, but for now.....
As for the wife. If I have to put up with her green draylon couch.......
Hi Darren, think B&W 800 diamond series would disagree with you on that.
Maybe so, but is that the exception that proves the rule?
Say a speaker manufacturer has a budget of say £100 to turn out a pair of speakers (his cost, not the price the consumer pays at the shop). Assuming his cabinet cost (we'll call that X in best algebra tradition) is directly proportional to cabinet size (not a precise formula I agree) then if the cabinets for floor standers are twice the height of the equivalent standmounters, it stands to reason that the manufacturer has £100-X to spend on the standmounter internals compared to £100-2X for the floorstanders. QED unless the manufacturer has the residual hearing of a retired lifetime pneumatic drill operator, the standmounters should have better internals than the floorstanders. Whether that translates into an overall improvement in audio quality is then down to the skill of the manufacturer in selecting and matching all the components. Sometimes that will work out superbly (as, maybe, in the case of the B&Ws you mentioned), sometimes not.