Alberich said:
Leif said:
Gray wrote: "Is it just me? (and I don't care if it is) but when you see 'impedance' written as 'imprudance,' doesn't it put you off slightly?
If you read the article, you'll see this is not the only mistake. Yes, of course we know what they mean, but there's just no excuse for not proof reading and correcting.
There's a case for saying that proof reading a begginer's guide is all the more important. I say such simple attention to detail is always important."
I sea watt ewe mean. They kneed to take moor care, do they knot?
Lol , always a risky endeavour highlighting grammar errors. Better make sure autocorrect has your back
0lny srmat poelpe can raed tihs. I cdnuolt
blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd
waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal
pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a
rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy,_it
deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the Itteers in
a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht
the fríst and Isat Itteer be in the rghít pclae.
The rset can be a taotl mses and you can
sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm._Tihs is
bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed
ervey Iteter by istlef, but the wrod as a
wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas
tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!