mitch65:
having filled the stands with 4 trowels of sand each equaling about 10% (give or take), sibilance has now disappeared. The sound is now less edgy and less fatiguing on extended listening. Amy Macdonald's voice is still nicely positioned in the soundstage without threatening my fillings!
Don't think the TV's going on tonight somehow.
I am now officially a tweaker! How anal is that!
I wish I could say it will get better but I would be fibbing.
For my own part, to my great surprise, I am back to square one!
I started the evening with empty stands. The sound was good, but I was unsure about something that eluded me. I decided to try out some bricks under the stands. Yes, I know it's departing from the exercise, but talk of granite slabs and all that tempted me. Anyway, I tried it and concluded it was no real step forward or backward. I then re-instated the BluTak I had been using until relatively recently; nope, for me it seemed a retrograde step as something ebbed away from the listening experience. Putting the half squash balls back confirmed it - the definition improved.
So, back to Dune. Having seived all the sandworms out, I started the tedious process of adding the sand back in. Bah, the stuff goes everywhere (good job I was still using the ground sheet). I tried various methods involving rolled up paper, a funnel and just a trowel - the paper seemed the best...just. And then, belatedly, I had the Eureka! moment. A 1.5 or 2 litre coke bottle! Rubbish! Why? Neck too small. But lateral thinking came to the rescue - a 2 litre plastic milk carton, with the base cut off was the answer. Not only does it allow a relatively accurate measure of the sand, but you can use the cap to avoid spillages (just don't drop it into the hole in the speaker stand!) This made the process so much quicker and less of a pain.
Having filled the stands with about 15 trowels each without the aid of the milk container, I had listened and decided there was no obvious change, although I did begin to wonder whether there might be a move towards greater weight! I gave up for a while and went for a drive to enjoy the sunset - not very spectacular, I must say, but it served to freshen me up. At this point I forged ahead and filled the stands to about 75%-80% capacity. I just couldn't be bothered with incremental steps.
Lo and behold, the sound was re-defined. I must say right now that it may be purely a matter of taste; that the sound of my system without the sand would suit other listeners. However, for me, now that I have listened to the two, I much prefer the filled stands. The sound is more defined, more weighty in the right areas but allowing the precision of delicate instruments to shine through. I was quite surprised to hear a better depth and presence of sound by comparison. Cymbals are zingy and don't splash any more than I would expect given the system I have. I think it is time to stop playing in the sand for now. Empty, the Atacamas do a decent job in my room; fill them and they provide a firm foundation that really seems to improve the overall sonic experience.
Just in case you are not aware of the fact, the living room floor is a suspended wooden affair. It may be that the configuration I have chosen is right for this kind of floor. It might also be that the combination of the system components, layout and my personal tastes differ enough that others would disagree. It certainly means I have no intention of increasing my level of anality in the sand department!
But one final note: given that Best Buy are coming to a shopping complex near me soon, I might just take my Spendors along to test-drive a few modern alternatives to the venerable SE24s. I wonder if they do an 'on approval' service? Because I bet
they haven't a suspended wooden floor!
And so to bed...I hear the sandman a-callin'.