Samsung Display’s new QD-OLED panel can hit 1,000 nits brightness for improved HDR
They’re reportedly brighter, and more colorful.
www.theverge.com
www.theverge.com
Tinman1952
Well-known member
That's interesting... Digital Trends reckon it will go up to 1500 nits peak brightness. 🙂Samsung Display’s new QD-OLED panel can hit 1,000 nits brightness for improved HDR
They’re reportedly brighter, and more colorful.
It’s a 1000 nits on a 10 per cent patch which is what OLEDs are traditionally measured on. Basically most OLED TVs can hit 1000 nits in dynamic mode picture setting on a 10 per cent patch too.
Curlyriff
Well-known member
Anyway 160 nits for the Panasonic OLED away from the 1000 nits is nothing in terms of brightness.
Curlyriff
Well-known member
The Sony as example gets to 750Nits so still 250Nits away. Yes the Panasonic gets close with it being around 920Nits but that is actually an outlier to most OLED panels and their 10% dynamic range. The G1 is actually also pretty solid performance wise around 830Nits.
The QN95A/90A, C1, A90J, X90J are all much similar with it much closer to the 750Nit figure than the 1k figure. It should be noted that also most at 1% and 10% are generally pretty close too so the 3% at 1500Nits is still impressive and likely means the range from 3% to 10% are generally better.
Dismissing 160Nits though is a little short sighted I feel personally.
Friesiansam
Well-known member
But, but, who needs a TV so bright, you need sunglasses on to watch it?
GSV Ethics Gradient
Moderator
I must admit that I find OLED plenty bright enough - but I guess it's only when you see something for yourself that you can decide whether it's worth it.
When you compare OLED to plasma it is definitely bright enough.
This is interesting though:
www.sammobile.com
Samsung might just destroy LG’s lead in OLED TV market
Samsung Display's new QD-OLED display technology has been turning a lot of eyeballs at the ongoing CES 2022 event in Las ...
www.sammobile.com
Curlyriff
Well-known member
You've linked something that shows the 10% of 830Nits as what? The other comment that 900 to 1000Nits is neglagible also doesn't lend anything to the fact other TV's are hitting 750-830Nits compared to 1000Nits at 10% and nowhere close to 1500Nits at 3%
Edit: And none of this lends to the comment that most TVs hit 1000Nits at 10%
It was Philips TVs that I read hit over 900 nits and close to 1000 nits see here:
www.pocket-lint.com
And this was the 806 with all the increased brightness manufacturers have been claiming for the likes of the G2 and Philips new OLED isn’t it plausible to say OLED TVs reach 900-1000 nits in a statement?
Philips OLED806 4K TV with Ambilight review: Light up your lounge
The 2021 Ambilight OLED TV from Philips delivers cracking picture quality - although you might need to fiddle with the settings to get the very best.
www.pocket-lint.com
And this was the 806 with all the increased brightness manufacturers have been claiming for the likes of the G2 and Philips new OLED isn’t it plausible to say OLED TVs reach 900-1000 nits in a statement?
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/hardware/comments/p2h8sp/samsung_2022_oled_tv_specs_revealed_4k_1000_nits/
Samsung 4K OLED 1000 nits
LG G2 20-30 more brighter
Philips EX OLED model more brighter
Like the link says the difference in 150 nits is nothing which I already told you. In fact 250 nits difference is nothing too from what I have witness from my OLED purchases so for you to keep claiming 750 nits is not 1000 nits is short sighted in my opinion too of you. When the numbers of OLED TVs have hit far greater numbers too and will only get better.
Samsung 4K OLED 1000 nits
LG G2 20-30 more brighter
Philips EX OLED model more brighter
Like the link says the difference in 150 nits is nothing which I already told you. In fact 250 nits difference is nothing too from what I have witness from my OLED purchases so for you to keep claiming 750 nits is not 1000 nits is short sighted in my opinion too of you. When the numbers of OLED TVs have hit far greater numbers too and will only get better.
Curlyriff
Well-known member
Right okay.
I understand that you have decided 750Nits is not much difference to 1000Nits (I can only compare to 900Nits what I have available since 1000Nits isn't something I have tested in person cause I have never had any of the above panels discuss ever hit more than 900Nits so that is where I am questioning that TVs can hit 1000Nits.
That is the untrue statement to the full. You have yet to show a single TV actually gets to 1000Nits regardless if you can see the difference.
I have not found that true at all and the difference is noticable at the 10% point between 750Nits to 900Nits in my opinion.
Now since we haven't really had 1000Nits on most TV's at the 10% range it is hard to quantify if it is any good.
Further to that yeah you linked a video discussing that the brightness to a different tech and where their brightness isn't good for more than 10 seconds or whatever. Okay right? Is it the concern now that the 10% 1000Nits shown for QD-OLED will have similar issue?
Now you are pulling in irrelevant information and data about a comment you've made which you have not once shown evidence of. I really don't understand the principle of what you are trying to prove with zero data showing your comment. Anyways I will leave it there cause this isn't going anywhere because I really don't think you are correct and haven't shown anything at all and just shifted goalposts.
Thanks for the conversation though.
GSV Ethics Gradient
Moderator
Curlyriff
Well-known member
I mean all I was stating is that 1000Nits at 10% isn't a thing for an OLED TV. That hasn't been shown from a single article or own testing. At best 920Nits was the highest figure. Yeah can you get a TV there, course. Are there a couple out there capable? Probably but it isn't a standard thing for an OLED tv and not what was posted to dismiss the point that Samsung has achieved with this.
This is interesting article from WHF:
www.whathifi.com
Sony A95K QD-OLED TV vs LG G2 OLED Evo TV: which will be the best 2022 OLED TV?
The battle of the next-gen OLED TVs
www.whathifi.com
QD-OLED vs OLED: What's the difference?
There's a battle brewing between QD-OLED and OLED, as we go through the ways in which the two display technologies differ.
www.trustedreviews.com
nopiano
Well-known member
Is having a mega-bright screen any practical benefit at home? Maybe for store settings, but surely not in a typical domestic environment?
When our 2021 model LG OLED55 B1 arrived yesterday, within minutes I’d reduced the Contrast from 100 to about 75, and upped the brightness a bit. It’s blooming marvellous though!
When our 2021 model LG OLED55 B1 arrived yesterday, within minutes I’d reduced the Contrast from 100 to about 75, and upped the brightness a bit. It’s blooming marvellous though!
bigboss
Moderator
It's not about the entire screen going bright. One of the main aspects to HDR performance is creating realistic highlights. The brighter these small areas of the screen are, the better is the HDR performance. For example, a glint off an aircraft's metallic skin.
GSV Ethics Gradient
Moderator
Samsung Display’s new QD-OLED panel can hit 1,000 nits brightness for improved HDR
They’re reportedly brighter, and more colorful.
www.theverge.com
nopiano
Well-known member
That’s a really good point - I’d not grasped that, but it’s exactly what I see on Green Planet, as the sun glints off dew drops, for example. I get it now!
Similar threads
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram