Aye. They still stack up well to modern floorstanders in the sub-£1000 bracket.Those RS6s are beautiful.
I heard the model that replaced them the RX6, and the RSs were better. Think most companies get it just right with one model, and IMHO Monitor Audio 'nailed it' with the RS6s.
I would imagine they are a cracking match for the Attessa. The certainly were with the Kandy & Caspian models.
The only slight caveat is the RS6s demand good quality amplification. They suffer from a dip in ohms
Hiya Matthew. Hope you're keeping safe.Hi PP. I think there's a pattern there with Monitor Audio. I liked the Bronze BR2 and BX2 models, but thought the Bronze 2s and current Bronze 100s to be a step backwards, losing what made the older models special.
Will you stop trying to sell your £8 grand subwoofers with comments like this.
Totally wrong. A simple statement like 'a subwoofer ' would suffice.....
Will you stop trying to sell your £8 grand subwoofers with comments like this.
Totally wrong. A simple statement like 'a subwoofer ' would suffice.....
Hi PP. I think there's a pattern there with Monitor Audio. I liked the Bronze BR2 and BX2 models, but thought the Bronze 2s and current Bronze 100s to be a step backwards, losing what made the older models special.
Rick's wishes have been addressed - I'll just flag up these two forum rules:You really need to chill, essentially what Musicraft was trying to say is what a capable amp the Atessa is. I agree he pushes subs, but have you seen the punishing specs of the Gold 300?
Really, relax.
Regrettably I have do disagree with your interpretation of things.You really need to chill, essentially what Musicraft was trying to say is what a capable amp the Atessa is. I agree he pushes subs, but have you seen the punishing specs of the Gold 300?
Really, relax.
Rick's wishes have been addressed
Regrettably I have do disagree with your interpretation of things.
Yes I agree the Gold 300 can be a tad difficult to drive and there perhaps was a good point, however there was no need to add any information about subwoofers at all.
As is your right. But no more about it on this thread, please.It's likely that I'll also be making a complaint against you too as I feel you've been complicit.
I am afraid that even if I did go and listen to one I wouldn't be buying it and my thoughts on sound quality would be meaningless to anyone else.I wish someone would go and listen to one, instead of this eyeballing. Hey there's an Audio T down the road maybe they stock-em?
That's very true, Al ears. I guess it would be meaningless to anyone, unless you heard it yourself I would think.I am afraid that even if I did go and listen to one I wouldn't be buying it and my thoughts on sound quality would be meaningless to anyone else.
subs
Yes I am interested in hearing that too! 🙂
Would you please clarify exactly what you mean by "lags behind" ? Thank you.If pre/subwoofer output lags behind
yeah but I think it looks the doggies....Interestingly the Model 40 is a curious amp, the only real advantage over the PM7000N is the addition of a HDMI port and 10 extra watts for a lot more money, on paper at least.
Hopefully this is also true, in addition to the posh casework.....🤞Interestingly the Model 40 is a curious amp, the only real advantage over the PM7000N is the addition of a HDMI port and 10 extra watts for a lot more money, on paper at least.
yeah but I think it looks the doggies....
While we could talk amps, wouldn't forum best chat about performance.Well I think it looks great.