Hi, All,
Need your knowledge, expertise and advice.
My current setup is as follows:
NAD C320BEE stereo amp.
Yamaha CDX-393 CD Player.
crappy standard interconnect cables.
Monitor Audio Silver RX-2 speakers.
Speaker cables are OK, but nothing fancy (but not total crap), not sure what brand.
PC connected to the amp via a IC cable which was considered good in a PC store Coda or something like that.
HDMI cable to a Panasonic TH-L32E30 LED TV (acts as a PC monitor)
Main usage is music from both the CD Player and the PC as well as movies.
I don't intend to go to a surround upgrade in the near future as well.
My first recent upgrade was from old Morel Acoustics 80Watt speakers, which sounded nice, but not as nice as the MA RX-2.
However when I purchased the speakers I understood that my next upgrade may need to be the amp since it may not be powerful enough (per channel) to open the speakers well, especially when on lower Db levels. And I did notice that when played at a higher volume I hear much more detail.
Now my dilemma is as follows (sorry for the long intro):
A friend of mine is selling his Onkyo TX-SR608.
We hooked it up with my existing setup, and played through Pure Audio setting (no processing at all) and compared to my NAD when it's also on zero equalizer tweaking. Played at roughly the same volume (the Onkyo was on 60 volume setting) the Onkyo gave more detail, much more instruments separation, and the bass was more vivid and crisp, while on the NAD it's all kind of compressed and nothing stands out.
This was wihout utilizing the Bi-Wire setup my speakers and the Onkyo are capable of.
So my question here is, should I go through with the AMP upgrade though I won't use all the AV surround and other features of this amp (though I'd like to connect the PC via HDMI and then output to Panasonic TV via HDMI as well).
My friend (a big WHF fan) also suggested I'd get the AudioQuest FLX-SLiP 14/4 speaker cables, and the Atlas Element Integra IC cables as well as AudioQuest Pearl HDMI cable. So this upgrade would cost me around 600 quid (the price for the new Onkyo here is 715gbp, while my friend sells his for 430gbp).
I'm not sure I want to spend so much money on this at the moment.
So as a first step I've ordered new IC cable the QED Profile phono to phono cable. Since that part is the most crappy in my setup. I'm not sure how good the CD is, and what could be the culprit in my system right now which should be replaced first.
And I've just read here on the forums that my NAD is not that bad at all.
So please suggest what should I do?
P.S. I'm traveling to Berlin tomorrow and intend to purchase thse AudioQuest FLX-SLiP 14/4 cables, but not sure if there's use in them if I don't replace the amp since my NAD doesn't support bi-wire.
Need your knowledge, expertise and advice.
My current setup is as follows:
NAD C320BEE stereo amp.
Yamaha CDX-393 CD Player.
crappy standard interconnect cables.
Monitor Audio Silver RX-2 speakers.
Speaker cables are OK, but nothing fancy (but not total crap), not sure what brand.
PC connected to the amp via a IC cable which was considered good in a PC store Coda or something like that.
HDMI cable to a Panasonic TH-L32E30 LED TV (acts as a PC monitor)
Main usage is music from both the CD Player and the PC as well as movies.
I don't intend to go to a surround upgrade in the near future as well.
My first recent upgrade was from old Morel Acoustics 80Watt speakers, which sounded nice, but not as nice as the MA RX-2.
However when I purchased the speakers I understood that my next upgrade may need to be the amp since it may not be powerful enough (per channel) to open the speakers well, especially when on lower Db levels. And I did notice that when played at a higher volume I hear much more detail.
Now my dilemma is as follows (sorry for the long intro):
A friend of mine is selling his Onkyo TX-SR608.
We hooked it up with my existing setup, and played through Pure Audio setting (no processing at all) and compared to my NAD when it's also on zero equalizer tweaking. Played at roughly the same volume (the Onkyo was on 60 volume setting) the Onkyo gave more detail, much more instruments separation, and the bass was more vivid and crisp, while on the NAD it's all kind of compressed and nothing stands out.
This was wihout utilizing the Bi-Wire setup my speakers and the Onkyo are capable of.
So my question here is, should I go through with the AMP upgrade though I won't use all the AV surround and other features of this amp (though I'd like to connect the PC via HDMI and then output to Panasonic TV via HDMI as well).
My friend (a big WHF fan) also suggested I'd get the AudioQuest FLX-SLiP 14/4 speaker cables, and the Atlas Element Integra IC cables as well as AudioQuest Pearl HDMI cable. So this upgrade would cost me around 600 quid (the price for the new Onkyo here is 715gbp, while my friend sells his for 430gbp).
I'm not sure I want to spend so much money on this at the moment.
So as a first step I've ordered new IC cable the QED Profile phono to phono cable. Since that part is the most crappy in my setup. I'm not sure how good the CD is, and what could be the culprit in my system right now which should be replaced first.
And I've just read here on the forums that my NAD is not that bad at all.
So please suggest what should I do?
P.S. I'm traveling to Berlin tomorrow and intend to purchase thse AudioQuest FLX-SLiP 14/4 cables, but not sure if there's use in them if I don't replace the amp since my NAD doesn't support bi-wire.