Having ordered a pair of MA GX50's which should arrive at the weekend, I'm turning my attention to set-up, so have a couple of questions.
Bi-amping
As my AVR has 7.1 channels and I'm currently using just 5.1 of these with my current MA Radius system, when the GX50's arrive, I'll have the opportunity to bi-amp them using the spare channels. This seemed to be the obvious choice to tidy up the bass, but I noticed that the What Hifi review of these speakers recommended single-wiring them to "help keep things cohesive". Do any of you have experience using the GX50's either way? I'm finding it difficult to imagine (in theory anyway) what possible advantage there could be NOT bi-amping them.
Stands
Again, the obvious choice would be the MA stands designed for the GX50's and GX100's, but I'm yet to be convinced. I have a very resonant floor, which is one of the reasons I want to return to small stand-mounts to aid the separation of speaker and floor. The design of the MA's don't look that great at keeping resonance in check, but I'd be interested in your experiments with either these or other stands.
For design and price (they're £150 cheaper) I quite like the look of the Q Acoustics Concept 20 stands. I think it's easier to prevent 3 feet from resonating or rattling than the four spikes of the MA Gold stands, and the Q Acoustics make use of the 'Gelcore' technology, which again might help with my resonant floor issue. The black stands would also suit my piano black GX50's more than the grey MA stands.
But there's always the issue of the top plate. I used to have spikes ontop when I had my Ruark Epilogues and while this sounded good, it was pretty unstable and easy to knock. It would also damage the lacquer of the MA's, so I'm not keen on that this time. I'm very much open to suggestions on that front please.
So I'd be interested in any comments you might have in setting up the GX50's. In the style of Lloyd Grossman, "it's over to you".
Bi-amping
As my AVR has 7.1 channels and I'm currently using just 5.1 of these with my current MA Radius system, when the GX50's arrive, I'll have the opportunity to bi-amp them using the spare channels. This seemed to be the obvious choice to tidy up the bass, but I noticed that the What Hifi review of these speakers recommended single-wiring them to "help keep things cohesive". Do any of you have experience using the GX50's either way? I'm finding it difficult to imagine (in theory anyway) what possible advantage there could be NOT bi-amping them.
Stands
Again, the obvious choice would be the MA stands designed for the GX50's and GX100's, but I'm yet to be convinced. I have a very resonant floor, which is one of the reasons I want to return to small stand-mounts to aid the separation of speaker and floor. The design of the MA's don't look that great at keeping resonance in check, but I'd be interested in your experiments with either these or other stands.
For design and price (they're £150 cheaper) I quite like the look of the Q Acoustics Concept 20 stands. I think it's easier to prevent 3 feet from resonating or rattling than the four spikes of the MA Gold stands, and the Q Acoustics make use of the 'Gelcore' technology, which again might help with my resonant floor issue. The black stands would also suit my piano black GX50's more than the grey MA stands.
But there's always the issue of the top plate. I used to have spikes ontop when I had my Ruark Epilogues and while this sounded good, it was pretty unstable and easy to knock. It would also damage the lacquer of the MA's, so I'm not keen on that this time. I'm very much open to suggestions on that front please.
So I'd be interested in any comments you might have in setting up the GX50's. In the style of Lloyd Grossman, "it's over to you".