D
gel said:Personally i would prefer Harry Potter over Lord Of The Rings.
Michael Gambon, Maggie Smith, Jason Isaacs, Robbie Coltrane, Richard Harris, Alan Rickman, John Hurt - they are rubbish aren't they. Two wonderful series of films, perfectly possible to love them both.Big Chris said:gel said:Personally i would prefer Harry Potter over Lord Of The Rings.
Oh Pul-ease. Harry Potter's are kids films. Poor stories poorly acted. L.O.T.R has a depth that H.P could only dream about thinking about hoping for.
hammill said:Big Chris said:gel said:Personally i would prefer Harry Potter over Lord Of The Rings.
Oh Pul-ease. Harry Potter's are kids films. Poor stories poorly acted. L.O.T.R has a depth that H.P could only dream about thinking about hoping for.
Michael Gambon, Maggie Smith, Jason Isaacs, Robbie Coltrane, Richard Harris, Alan Rickman, John Hurt - they are rubbish aren't they.
hammill said:Big Chris said:gel said:Personally i would prefer Harry Potter over Lord Of The Rings.
Oh Pul-ease. Harry Potter's are kids films. Poor stories poorly acted. L.O.T.R has a depth that H.P could only dream about thinking about hoping for.
Michael Gambon, Maggie Smith, Jason Isaacs, Robbie Coltrane, Richard Harris, Alan Rickman, John Hurt - they are rubbish aren't they.
The_Lhc said:You can be a great actor and still be lumbered with poor dialogue, ask Harrison Ford.
Indeed you can as Mr Ford was. Having children who like to watch the Harry Potter films on a regular basis, I think the dialogue is pretty good- certainly when compared with rubbish like Transformers, Transformers 2 or The Last Airbender which the boys also sadly enjoy. The Narnia films, which should arguably be in the same market segment as Potter are not in the same class.The_Lhc said:hammill said:Big Chris said:gel said:Personally i would prefer Harry Potter over Lord Of The Rings.
Oh Pul-ease. Harry Potter's are kids films. Poor stories poorly acted. L.O.T.R has a depth that H.P could only dream about thinking about hoping for.
Michael Gambon, Maggie Smith, Jason Isaacs, Robbie Coltrane, Richard Harris, Alan Rickman, John Hurt - they are rubbish aren't they.
You can be a great actor and still be lumbered with poor dialogue, ask Harrison Ford.
masonica said:Having each film spread over 2 disks doesn't phase me as it should ensure that the films will be playing at the highest bit-rates possible. Hopefully this means that the PQ and SQ will be fantastic.
Indeed. Also, given that each half is as long as a normal film, I think the break would probably be needed regardless so changing disks is no hardship.professorhat said:masonica said:Having each film spread over 2 disks doesn't phase me as it should ensure that the films will be playing at the highest bit-rates possible. Hopefully this means that the PQ and SQ will be fantastic.
Agreed, I'd much rather the PQ and SQ was kept as high quality as possible and having to pause for a few seconds whilst discs are changed over than having a compromise on this just to fit everything on the one disc.
Thegelman said:£60 at Play.com for the extended versions - they are having a laugh aren't they?
http://www.play.com/DVD/Blu-ray/4-/19102858/The-Lord-Of-The-Rings-Trilogy-Extended-Edition-Box-Set/Product.html
Are you really going to pay that? if not how much would you pay to get them?
Cheers
BIGBERNARDBRESSLAW said:Thegelman said:£60 at Play.com for the extended versions - they are having a laugh aren't they?
http://www.play.com/DVD/Blu-ray/4-/19102858/The-Lord-Of-The-Rings-Trilogy-Extended-Edition-Box-Set/Product.html
Are you really going to pay that? if not how much would you pay to get them?
Cheers
Gel, can I call you that, thegelman seems so formal.
I'd pay £60 to not have to sit and watch the extended versions, unless I was having trouble sleeping.