I can't be they first to notice they glaring error on they fornt cover of they June mag, can I? Or am I just they only one sad enough to bother mentioning it?
daveyjay said:I can't be they first to notice they glaring error on they fornt cover of they June mag, can I? Or am I just they only one sad enough to bother mentioning it?
daveyjay said:That's exactly what I'm pointing out - I was trying to be funny, in the process, but anyway...
daveyjay said:Study they front cover a little more carefully.
simonlewis said:daveyjay said:Study they front cover a little more carefully.
Ahh got it, you mean WHFS&V printed "the" instead of "they".
daveyjay said:I can't be they first to notice they glaring error on they fornt cover of they June mag, can I? Or am I just they only one sad enough to bother mentioning it?
jjbomber said:The bit where they say all the probucts and rated on a per pound basis,
then test all the phones at £0.
daveyjay said:I've noticed errors inside the magazine before, but I thought a front cover slip up was worth a post.
plastic penguin said:It's irrelevant where the misprints are, that's the price you pay (literally) for too much reliance on computers. They are only as good as the operator inputting the information. Hey-ho.