That is correct Gray,why only this one speaker. I know I will probably get no joy from Kef,but if I buy a new driver is it going to happen again, or do I sling the kefs and keep to my Acoustic energy speakers
Signal level between channels can vary quite a lot during tracks, as can bass. More often than not, people will blow one bass driver, not both.That's all true of course David.
But (presumably) he's put the same signal, at the same level into his other speakers with no such (obvious) ill effect.
That's surely what this is all about.
Yes, you'd either need a drastic fault, or a careless owner to take out both.More often than not, people will blow one bass driver, not both.
The cone is visibly damaged Ray. Of that there is no doubt.I appreciate your comments David,but if the driver is damaged,why does the speaker sound fine
No not both drivers blown just the other side of the faulty driver has started to crack ,the other speaker is perfectYes, you'd either need a drastic fault, or a careless owner to take out both.
I meant that there has been no obvious damage to other brands of speaker for him, despite them having been subjected to the same amp / music / level. That's his point.
Ultimately, Kef themselves may be able to do little more than that.All you will probably get on here is people hypothesizing about probable cause and potential outcome.
Probably so but we on the forum are not going to solve this OP's issues....Ultimately, Kef themselves may be able to do little more than that.
(They're bound to say it's rare, regardless)
Whether the issue would be audible would depend on the nature of the damage, and would probably be less audible with a stiffer aluminium cone, but again, it depends on the nature of the damage to the cone.The cone is visibly damaged Ray. Of that there is no doubt.
David hasn't commented on whether or not it will be audible, he's given his opinion on the cause of the visible damage, that's all.
please see post #37Whether the issue would be audible would depend on the nature of the damage, and would probably be less audible with a stiffer aluminium cone, but again, it depends on the nature of the damage to the cone.
The fact that the cones are working tells me they haven’t been overdriven from a power point of view, but the type of damage - the outward curving around the edge of the cone due to the roll surround being pushed beyond its capabilities - points to a high level of bass being passed through them - this of course, could be within the power handling of the speakers. Think of it like playing a 100w amplifier at around 50w, which is fine, but then turning up the bass control to full.
I’m not calling him a liar, I’m just stating from experience the likely cause of what I see, based on decades of seeing his sort of thing, and the outcomes. My interpretation of the photos may differ from the story given. Over the decades, I’ve heard many stories about speakers self destructing under normal use, only to find out their kids had a party one weekend without their knowledge and caused the damage. Sometimes kids use their phone to stream some music and they’ve got their phone settings with extra bass etc, they get twitchy with the phones volume and just a moment can cause some damage. There’s numerous ways actual damage to cones can occur - just not when they’re used within their limits. We’ll see what KEF comes back with. He might be lucky - every now and again, a manufacturer might repair something as a good will gesture, but they won’t always make this clear - it’ll just be repaired “under warranty“. But a vertical tear in a stiff aluminium driver doesn’t look good to me.please see post #37
The OP is adamant the speakers have not be overdrive in any way, so your "high level of bass" is basically calling him a liar.
I for oneq fail to see how it could happen to only one speaker even if that is what it was.
I didn't realise the L50 Meta had been around that long.I’m not calling him a liar, I’m just stating from experience the likely cause of what I see, based on decades of seeing his sort of thing, and the outcomes. My interpretation of the photos may differ from the story given. Over the decades, I’ve heard many stories about speakers self destructing under normal use, only to find out their kids had a party one weekend without their knowledge and caused the damage. Sometimes kids use their phone to stream some music and they’ve got their phone settings with extra bass etc, they get twitchy with the phones volume and just a moment can cause some damage. There’s numerous ways actual damage to cones can occur - just not when they’re used within their limits. We’ll see what KEF comes back with. He might be lucky - every now and again, a manufacturer might repair something as a good will gesture, but they won’t always make this clear - it’ll just be repaired “under warranty“. But a vertical tear in a stiff aluminium driver doesn’t look good to me.
It’s not only one speaker though is it. Both cones are exhibiting what I see as signs of excessive cone discursion (the rounded effect near the edge of the cone), and now both cones have split. Whether this splitting is a result of the first issue I mentioned, I don’t know, but I wouldn’t expect a tear like that to be brought on by the first issue. Either way, we’re dealing with an aluminium cone that is very strong under normal useage, and would only tear/split due to a physical impact or unusual stress. I’ve seen Q Series cones completely obliterated by massive overdriving, and I’ve seen cones that have had some physical impact. I’ve also seen cones with that ‘rounding’ around the edge of the cone too, which as I say, is caused by the cone trying to travel further than the roll surround will let it.I didn't realise the L50 Meta had been around that long.
Point taken about unknown useage but it seems in this gentleman 's case it is unlikely.
whilst your knowledge is admirable and very valuable you are hypothesesing and, as I have said, it is not us that can solve the OPS issues.
Certainly it would be great to hear what KEF come back with If only to determine their sense of customer loyalty. I feel sure it will be peanuts to them to replace the drivers.
If bass response from a source is not specific to left or right channel can you explain why only one speaker suffers?
see post #76It’s not only one speaker though is it. Both cones are exhibiting what I see as signs of excessive cone discursion (the rounded effect near the edge of the cone), and now both cones have split. Whether this splitting is a result of the first issue I mentioned, I don’t know, but I wouldn’t expect a tear like that to be brought on by the first issue. Either way, we’re dealing with an aluminium cone that is very strong under normal useage, and would only tear/split due to a physical impact or unusual stress. I’ve seen Q Series cones completely obliterated by massive overdriving, and I’ve seen cones that have had some physical impact. I’ve also seen cones with that ‘rounding’ around the edge of the cone too, which as I say, is caused by the cone trying to travel further than the roll surround will let it.
You can Google “damaged KEF bass cone“ and see some similar effects.
Both speakers show the rounding off around the cone edges. I read post #74 wrong and thought the right one was splitting too - it’s the other side of the cone.see post #76
He says its only one speaker
Give me an axe and I'll show you some similar looking 'fatigue' 😆
Seriously though, do we think Kef are going to come back with an official verdict of fatigue?
If so, there will be more such cases, because plenty of people play at excessive levels.
Actually, that is not my point of view... i support your point of view on how the damage originated by external abuse or an accident
I'm in uk at moment seeing my children for first time in 2years re covid ,so am going to give kef a ring while here. An interesting note ,I called into a hifi shop in Manchester yesterday,and discussed my problem with the manager. He said,"Your not the first and will definitely not be the last with this problem ", his opinion was that the cones are "Just to sensitive " and he wouldn't recommend them for that reason. Doesn't solve my problem but interesting to here from a dealer. Regarding my other speaker there is no sign of any damage whatsoever, will send picture when i get back. The dealer did say he didn't think i stood much chance of getting a replacement but was worth a try.From seeing the photos in the first post, I presumed the two photos were showing the damage to the left cone and right cone separately, but they’re showing the same cone, which is where my confusion has come in. I’d like to see a close up photo of the right cone. If the right cone has zero deformation, that makes it all the more weird, as this wouldn’t happen to one cone unless there was some sort of channel imbalance where the right one doesn’t see the same level as the left. That would presume, of course, a signal present to cause high cone excursion in the first place.
This may be pertinent as it is possible you have damaged them by attempting to drive then with a amplifier outside of their specified limits.I'm in uk at moment seeing my children for first time in 2years re covid ,so am going to give kef a ring while here. An interesting note ,I called into a hifi shop in Manchester yesterday,and discussed my problem with the manager. He said,"Your not the first and will definitely not be the last with this problem ", his opinion was that the cones are "Just to sensitive " and he wouldn't recommend them for that reason. Doesn't solve my problem but interesting to here from a dealer. Regarding my other speaker there is no sign of any damage whatsoever, will send picture when i get back. The dealer did say he didn't think i stood much chance of getting a replacement but was worth a try.
Something i haven't mentioned before but perhaps worth a mention is that around 50% of the 8 months I've had the speakers, they have been connected to a Pioneer M73/C73 Reference amp/ preamp which is about 35 years old and has a Class A output of 20watts,which I wouldn't have thought should have been an issue. Just another difficult thing to explain,but will see what sort of a response I get when i phone on Monday .
I have already posted the recommended requirements that KEF suggest for partnering amplifiers.Perhaps you could explain why a 100 watt speaker should be damaged by a 20 watt class A amp
Thanks