Vladimir said:I have now my alarm clock set for 3:90am.
Impedance is futile.
Blacksabbath25 said:No Mr Bond you must Die ! *smile*
Vladimir said:Blacksabbath25 said:No Mr Bond you must Die ! *smile*
I have reflective silver latex panties (somewhere). Lasers are useless on me.
Gazzip said:Vladimir said:Blacksabbath25 said:No Mr Bond you must Die ! *smile*
I have reflective silver latex panties (somewhere). Lasers are useless on me.
Do you wear this while modding CD transports? Just asking. Not visualising.
Vladimir said:Gazzip said:Vladimir said:Blacksabbath25 said:No Mr Bond you must Die ! *smile*
I have reflective silver latex panties (somewhere). Lasers are useless on me.
Do you wear this while modding CD transports? Just asking. Not visualising.
Making the mechanism more innert by adding mass, damping and structural reinforcement doesn't involve doing the full monty dance on top of the laser pickup.
Amateur.
Vladimir said:Blacksabbath25 said:No Mr Bond you must Die ! *smile*
I have reflective silver latex panties (somewhere). Lasers are useless on me.
Design costs? In my hypothetical less is more world class CD player?Barbapapa said:lindsayt, nice overview. However, it misses how actual businesses have to work if they want to avoid bankruptcy. You focus, it appears, on the material costs at the expense of design, overhead (including management), profit margin, marketing costs. As has been discussed here in the past, and in other fora as well, the material costs of most modern technological equipment is only a relatively small part of the total costs. Consumers tend to forget this as they don't need to factor in their own labour: if you cook a meal or build a DIY speaker kit it may seem cheap, as you may actually enjoy the work. But a business needs to pay its employees. Hobby companies may forego these costs in the start-up phase, but eventually even these will realise they need to factor in these costs if they are to generate some income...
I wonder how many people thought the (infamous) Goldmund Eidos 18D was the best CD player they'd ever heard?davidf said:Doesn't really marry up with the best players I’ve heard, of which most have been over £2500.lindsayt said:Therefore any CD players costing over £2500 are a "rip-off" - when compared to our hypothetical minimalist one.
We can apply the same to DAC's.
I know I’m talking about multi-channel pre-amps here, but there’s a world of difference between an Audiolab 8200AP and a Classé Sigma SSP. If your pre-amp isn’t up to the job, it doesn’t matter how good the rest of the system is.When we move on to pre-amplifiers there's an argument that for some systems any pre-amp over £600 is a "rip-off".
Pre-amplifiers, despite being one of what should be one of the simplest products to produce, seems to be the hardest one to get right - there’s plenty around, but to get a really top notch one that stands out from the crowd is fairly rare.
davidf said:That’s bad.
Vladimir said:davidf said:That’s bad.
It probably works fine. Just the R&D doesn't show well on these pics.
Vladimir said:davidf said:That’s bad.
It probably works fine. Just the R&D doesn't show well on these pics.
Wow that thing really does look like it's been made in a shed, bet it sounds good though.drummerman said:Vladimir said:davidf said:That’s bad.
It probably works fine. Just the R&D doesn't show well on these pics.
Can't find anything under Edge.
Maybe look for Bono insteaddrummerman said:Vladimir said:davidf said:That’s bad.
It probably works fine. Just the R&D doesn't show well on these pics.
Can't find anything under Edge.
drummerman said:Vladimir said:davidf said:That’s bad.
It probably works fine. Just the R&D doesn't show well on these pics.
Can't find anything under Edge.