davedotco
New member
Vladimir said:In the budget segment one is better off buying passive speakers + amp than going active. Clicky
I remember DDC saying that there is one vital thing that gives even the active cheapies bigger appeal than passives and that is presence. That live, breathing infront of you sound. Now is this due to active topology or just because there is no bass to mask the midrange that much, less room interference etc. Thoughts?
There are good and bad products in all sectors of the market, budget priced products most of all.
I know you are indulging in a 'bit of stirring' here, but for the record.
The best 'cheap' actives are small 'desktop systems', 3 or 4 inch bass drivers that really are designed for the desktop. Bass capabilities are necessarily limited, which is fine in this application. However many of the larger 'cheap' models are not so good, flimsey cabinets, oversized, undercontrolled drivers etc, that is true enough though one or two models, usually oem 'own-brand' types are decent options if you need maximum output at minimum budget.
Actives that are direct replacements for entry level amp/speaker hi-fi combinations are going to be 5 inch models (or bigger) and cost £200-300 minimum. Try a pair of Yamaha HS7s against any price competitive amp/speaker combination.
Regarding the bass, speakers aimed at hi-fi users are voiced to sound like hi-fi, a warm, fat bass because that is what hi-fi buyers like. Compare with this....
Note the slightly falling bass response on the HS7 and HS5, ideal for hi-fi users who a rarely able to use their speakers in free space, even with a little boundary reinforcement, the bass remains tight and punchy.
That these types of speakers do not sound like budget hi-fi is pretty obvious, both from the specs and on audition, to me this is a very good thing.