How good is you hearing

[admin_exported]

How good is your hearing, has anyone on this forum had there hearing tested recently.

Just had the maximum frequency tested and it goes upto about 16.5khz which i thought was quite good

for 44. Next is to carry out amplitude test, and minimum frequncy change tests.

Any members on hear want to test their hearing and let us know how good it is.

There are quite a few online ear tests that work quite well.

here are few online tests.

http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/jw/hearing.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4G60hM1W_mk

 

[cyrus fan]

sorry, couldn't resist

 

[The_Lhc]

Better than my eyesight but even so I can still see you posted exactly the same thing yesterday.

 

[Anonymous]

At least you can use capitals and full stops Lhc. Looks like the spelling police are struggling with that bit!

 

[Anonymous]

 

[Anonymous]

Better than my eyesight but even so I can still see you posted exactly the same thing yesterday.

Yes and it disappeared/got deleted I can only assume by a what hifi guy for some reason. There seems to be a lot of that going on in this forum. So I posted it again.

 

[simonlewis]

Yawn, boring, this has been posted before. :wave:

 

[Anonymous]

Yawn, boring, this has been posted before. :wave:

Someone deleted it so it could not have been that boring

 

[Anonymous]

Yawn, boring, this has been posted before. :wave:

Why dont you test your hearing using one or both of the links and post the result

 

[Craig M.]

what's the point? it's not like i can do anything about the result. :?

 

[Anonymous]

what's the point? it's not like i can do anything about the result. :?

Sure you can!

My result on the link with the clickable boxes was:

Woo, I matched the graph sorta, do I win anything?

 

[Anonymous]

sorry, couldn't resist

Yeah, well maybe you should have! :wall: |(

 

[Andrew Everard]

Yes and it disappeared/got deleted I can only assume by a what hifi guy for some reason. There seems to be a lot of that going on in this forum. So I posted it again.

Assumption? That's not very scientific.

No conspiracy; just spam filtering.

 

[Lee H]

Yawn, boring, this has been posted before. :wave:

Why dont you test your hearing using one or both of the links and post the result

Why do you insist on turning the enjoyment of music away from emotion and in to black and white stats? Most of your posts seem to be challenges to readers/WHF staffers to prove something or other. Just enjoy it for what it is. How many are you "guys" anyway?

 

[Trefor Patten]

Why do those who post with bad spelling/grammar refer to those who correct them as spelling/grammar 'police'? Do these people not recognise that these disciplines are an aid to accuracy? Why would I take anyone's opinion seriously when they cannot be bothered to distinguish between their and there? If they are that careless, perhaps their opinions are as ill-informed as their spelling and their information similarly full of errors?

Surely checking before you post is just a courtesy to those who read, No?

 

[chebby]

Why dont you test your hearing using one or both of the links and post the result

No. I consider eye tests, ear tests, blood pressure tests etc. to be private information and I don't want to feed your curiosity or provide fuel for whatever agenda you might have.

 

[Lee H]

Why dont you test your hearing using one or both of the links and post the result

No. I consider eye tests, ear tests, blood pressure tests etc. to be private information and I don't want to feed your curiosity or provide fuel for whatever agenda you might have.

:clap:

 

[Anonymous]

My result on the link with the clickable boxes was:

Woo, I matched the graph sorta, do I win anything?

Yes you win a gold star from the scienceguys, lol

Thats not a bad result, not sure whether you qualify for the Audiophile golden ears award though.

I'l test mine using that site tonight and post my results.

EDITED BY MODS to clarfiy quote

 

[Alec]

Why do those who post with bad spelling/grammar refer to those who correct them as spelling/grammar 'police'? Do these people not recognise that these disciplines are an aid to accuracy? Why would I take anyone's opinion seriously when they cannot be bothered to distinguish between their and there? If they are that careless, perhaps their opinions are as ill-informed as their spelling and their information similarly full of errors?

Surely checking before you post is just a courtesy to those who read, No?

Yes, nd if u rite properish u mus no wot yer on bout yeh?

 

[CnoEvil]

A little selective deafness is not necessarily a bad thing.

 

[SteveR750]

Pardon?

 

[CJSF]

Why do those who post with bad spelling/grammar refer to those who correct them as spelling/grammar 'police'? Do these people not recognise that these disciplines are an aid to accuracy? Why would I take anyone's opinion seriously when they cannot be bothered to distinguish between their and there? If they are that careless, perhaps their opinions are as ill-informed as their spelling and their information similarly full of errors?

Surely checking before you post is just a courtesy to those who read, No?

Very Superior, 'Holier than though' . . . One has a beef about such attitudes, I'm dyslexic, however because my schooling was back in the 50's/60's, I was considered thick and ignored, pushed into a corner!! In retrospect, it has destroyed my life . . . ?? Not quite, certainly my potential has not been fully realised, but its to late to change now. My point, such attitude is rude and thoughtless, you are simply saying 'I am better than you' . . .

Thanks to a very supportive family, especially my late, dear wife, a magazine editor and the wonders of computer spell checking, I have managed to get by on the communication stakes, despite attitudes like yours!

Please, think before you open and put foot in big mouth . . . CJSF