CnoEvil
New member
BenLaw said:CnoEvil said:@ Ben
I think your assessment is reasonable and well considered. If you read through their blurb, it explains how this device came into existence. Check out the section called "White Paper" and scroll down to the paragraph starting "We used a high power audio amplifier" (opposite the first graph). It describes how getting their results "indirectly" was inefficient.....so this device was conceived.
They also say this:
After many months of testing we found that the results of the test comparisons were not always consistent and repeatable. The input voltage from the wall outlet to the amplifier could vary based upon time of day and other loads within the building. The test could vary depending upon the load on the amplifier and the specific heat that the amplifier was generating.
This could actually be used as an argument for mains regneration, which in a sense is designed to do what their machine does. But it rather seems to disprove their philosophy that (in the real world) all can be solved with after market mains cable and that doing so is an entirely different 'philosophy' from mains regeneration.
It also shows how fickle this whole area is, and how results can vary.
I didn't like the effect of an Isol 8 regenerator, but the Atlas Balanced transformer was much better.
IMO. If all this area gets debated in a reasonable manner, it does more good than harm.