Full album on 45rpm

toyota man

New member
Apr 22, 2009
79
0
0
Visit site
Hi I seem to remember that the sound quality is better on 45rpm as the music is spread over a longer grove so not so much information compressed onto the grove if that makes sense
 

MajorFubar

New member
Mar 3, 2010
690
7
0
Visit site
Considering that one of the sonic limitations of the format is that the linear velocity gets slower and slower the closer the arm gets to the centre, I was never quite sure why 78rpm was dispensed with. Should have made for some really decent sounding 12" singles, albeit limited to 6-7 minutes if they weren't to be cut too quiet. Maybe in the early days of vinyl the high linear velocity at the records' outer edges would have lead to to tracking problems or too much stylus wear to sapphire-tipped styli.
 

fr0g

New member
Jan 7, 2008
445
0
0
Visit site
The funny thing is, the guy goes on about nothing coming close to the quality and then talks about it being physics.

When of course even a 128K MP3 beats vinyl and physics gave us digital music.

Go figure.
 

Frank Harvey

Well-known member
Jun 27, 2008
567
1
18,890
Visit site
There is an increasing number of albums being released at 45rpm nowadays. Queens of the Stone Age's Like Clockwork and Foo Fighters' Wasting Light spring to mind, many Mobile Fidelity releases like those from Bob Dylan, most Analogue Productions release are 45rpm and on 200gm vinyl too, like The Doors L.A. woman and Credence Clearwater Revival releases.

Despite the claims of digital superiority, I find it odd that even standard vinyl usually outperforms digital releases for dynamic range.
 
David@FrankHarvey said:
There is an increasing number of albums being released at 45rpm nowadays. Queens of the Stone Age's Like Clockwork and Foo Fighters' Wasting Light spring to mind, many Mobile Fidelity releases like those from Bob Dylan, most Analogue Productions release are 45rpm and on 200gm vinyl too, like The Doors L.A. woman and Credence Clearwater Revival releases.

Despite the claims of digital superiority, I find it odd that even standard vinyl usually outperforms digital releases for dynamic range.

I quite agree. I have yet to hear any mp3 file that sounds better or even as good as my vinyl set-up. I have a feeling many others feel this way too and this has only assisted the current trend in turntable sales and associated vinyl 'revival' (although in my case it never went away.)
 
A

Anderson

Guest
Al ears said:
David@FrankHarvey said:
There is an increasing number of albums being released at 45rpm nowadays. Queens of the Stone Age's Like Clockwork and Foo Fighters' Wasting Light spring to mind, many Mobile Fidelity releases like those from Bob Dylan, most Analogue Productions release are 45rpm and on 200gm vinyl too, like The Doors L.A. woman and Credence Clearwater Revival releases.

Despite the claims of digital superiority, I find it odd that even standard vinyl usually outperforms digital releases for dynamic range.

I quite agree. I have yet to hear any mp3 file that sounds better or even as good as my vinyl set-up. I have a feeling many others feel this way too and this has only assisted the current trend in turntable sales and associated vinyl 'revival' (although in my case it never went away.)

Its the mastering not the format, digital is the middle child, so much potential but wasted because he wants to get high every day instead of studying for good grades. Vinyl is the first born dumb kid, makes up for his ability by putting time into studying and etyig the grades. Modern life.

You can rip vinyl to MP3 and it sounds exactely the same as the original.
 

Frank Harvey

Well-known member
Jun 27, 2008
567
1
18,890
Visit site
Al ears said:
Now now David. Perhaps it does on his system.

I know he mentions in his sig about disconnecting his brain, but I can only presume he's already disconnected his ears...

Of course, any format recorded to a digital format will sound (basically) the same, but only within the limitations of that recording format. Compressing a vinyl signal to MP3 may well retain certain vinyl characteristics/distortions (call them what you will depending which side of the fence you sit on), but that doesn't mean that the MP3 version you're listening to "sounds exactly the same as the original". Compression aside, you've still got the D-A and A-D processes that will have their effects. I know what is coming after that statement, but if you compare products that use different DAC chips (Wolfson/Burr Brown etc), there are differences to be heard.
 

Frank Harvey

Well-known member
Jun 27, 2008
567
1
18,890
Visit site
Anderson said:
Its the mastering not the format, digital is the middle child, so much potential but wasted because he wants to get high every day instead of studying for good grades. Vinyl is the first born dumb kid, makes up for his ability by putting time into studying and etyig the grades. Modern life.

*fool*
 
David@FrankHarvey said:
Al ears said:
Now now David. Perhaps it does on his system.

I know he mentions in his sig about disconnecting his brain, but I can only presume he's already disconnected his ears...

Of course, any format recorded to a digital format will sound (basically) the same, but only within the limitations of that recording format. Compressing a vinyl signal to MP3 may well retain certain vinyl characteristics/distortions (call them what you will depending which side of the fence you sit on), but that doesn't mean that the MP3 version you're listening to "sounds exactly the same as the original". Compression aside, you've still got the D-A and A-D processes that will have their effects. I know what is coming after that statement, but if you compare products that use different DAC chips (Wolfson/Burr Brown etc), there are differences to be heard.

I concur. To my mind you cannot get any higher 'resolution' than a pure analogue signal anyway.
 
David@FrankHarvey said:
Anderson said:
Its the mastering not the format, digital is the middle child, so much potential but wasted because he wants to get high every day instead of studying for good grades. Vinyl is the first born dumb kid, makes up for his ability by putting time into studying and etyig the grades. Modern life.

*fool*

Possibly clear evidence of just that.
wink_smile.gif
 

MajorFubar

New member
Mar 3, 2010
690
7
0
Visit site
Al ears said:
I concur. To my mind you cannot get any higher 'resolution' than a pure analogue signal anyway.

Theorectically that should be true but the trouble is they haven't invented an analogue recording and distribution system which doesn't add a load of noise and distortion by its very nature. And of the various analogue media that were once popular, records were the worst culprit.
 
MajorFubar said:
Al ears said:
I concur. To my mind you cannot get any higher 'resolution' than a pure analogue signal anyway.

Theorectically that should be true but the trouble is they haven't invented an analogue recording and distribution system which doesn't add a load of noise and distortion by its very nature. And of the various analogue media that were once popular, records were the worst culprit.

My point precisely sir, so any highly compressed MP3 ripped from said vinyl is going to sound infinitely worse.
 

MajorFubar

New member
Mar 3, 2010
690
7
0
Visit site
Well it's true that the ADC-DAC conversion can never be truly honestly transparent because the sound will in some way be affected by the additional circuitry its passed through, like passing it through a tape recorder's rec/pb tape loop. But listening to the playback, in most cases you'd be hard pushed to tell if the digital file had been stored as a lossless codec or 320K MP3.
 
David@FrankHarvey said:
I've heard a few people say good things about that release, and L.A. Woman by The Doors.

Isn't life strange? You are right about LA Woman David, says great things for valve equipment re-mastering, it's extremely well done.

I said strange because I have the Doors number and am currently still awaiting my copy of Rumours.
 

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts