I agree that many products seem a lot pricier than a few years ago. Trouble is, they need both volume and a decent margin to survive, as well as the none too usual efficiencies of production, design, etc.Andrewjvt said:Is far too overpriced these days
Andrewjvt said:Is far too overpriced these days
MajorFubar said:I can't tell you one person I've ever met in nearly 50 years of living who owns high-end hifi.
plastic penguin said:Trouble is you can only make a profit if you have a turnover. If Electro's price point is higher than competitors, they lose out. It's simple business acumen.
The other problem is UK outlets -- over the last few years they have diminished. No retailer, no sale.
Prices are increasing because of greed, instead of need.
Electro said:plastic penguin said:Trouble is you can only make a profit if you have a turnover. If Electro's price point is higher than competitors, they lose out. It's simple business acumen.
The other problem is UK outlets -- over the last few years they have diminished. No retailer, no sale.
Prices are increasing because of greed, instead of need.
It's true that the prices have risen over the past few years but the Electrocompaniet classic range was still far cheaper than it's sonic or build quality / design equivalent.
In the past Electrocompaniet equipment was sold far too cheaply to be taken seriously in the high end arena and was not flashy or fast changing enough for the midrange market that demands a new model on a regular basis to feed the insecurity of mid range box swappers, you could buy say an ECI5 integrated for 3 grand that out performed a 6 grand or more amp in all areas and was far better value for money, so why upgrade from it .
Electrocompaniet equipment was / is too good for it's own good in a nutshell .
DIB said:MajorFubar said:I can't tell you one person I've ever met in nearly 50 years of living who owns high-end hifi.
Not just high end either. In my entire family and group of friends I am pretty sure I'm the only one with anything remotely hifi. However my daughter has just bought herself a little £25 bluetooth speaker so she can play Spotify off her iphone. (tbh for what it is, it sounds bloody good!)
.
I have to agree Major. But I do think it’ll come to a point where legacy hifi will become so scarce, that it’ll only take a handful of those to hear a good quality legacy type system and realise just how good they can sound. Then, like most things, the trend comes round again. I still say that vinyl’s comeback was partly down to the decade around 1995-2005, where people’s expectations with regards to sound quality were at an all time low - MP3 was all the rage during this era, and TVs became so thin that sound quality was non existent. After being used to that, stick a record on and it’ll sound nothing short of sumptuous. I think people either discovered - or remembered - just how “nice” records sound...MajorFubar said:To an extent, hifi as we know it began to die a death with the advent of CDs. The sound quality from the worst sounding cheapest CD players was so far ahead of the sound quality from the worst sounding nasty plastic scratchy record players. it wasn't even funny. This new bare minimum was suddenly good enough for most people. So if CDs were the first fleshwound, the fatal blow has been the advent of all-in-one technology, like Sonos, Amazon Echo, Apple HomePods and active speakers. These devices produce a sound quality on par with or better than most people heard from their lounge full of ugly boxes and wires trailing everywhere, and they wouldn’t go back to the latter if you paid them. Even myself: I own a pair of active speakers which I stream to via Airplay, and frankly I’ve never had sound so good.
The days of the legacy hifi system are numbered really.
MajorFubar said:To an extent, hifi as we know it began to die a death with the advent of CDs. The sound quality from the worst sounding cheapest CD players was so far ahead of the sound quality from the worst sounding nasty plastic scratchy record players. it wasn't even funny. This new bare minimum was suddenly good enough for most people. So if CDs were the first fleshwound, the fatal blow has been the advent of all-in-one technology, like Sonos, Amazon Echo, Apple HomePods and active speakers. These devices produce a sound quality on par with or better than most people heard from their lounge full of ugly boxes and wires trailing everywhere, and they wouldn’t go back to the latter if you paid them. Even myself: I own a pair of active speakers which I stream to via Airplay, and frankly I’ve never had sound so good.
The days of the legacy hifi system are numbered really.
Andrewjvt said:Electro said:plastic penguin said:Trouble is you can only make a profit if you have a turnover. If Electro's price point is higher than competitors, they lose out. It's simple business acumen.
The other problem is UK outlets -- over the last few years they have diminished. No retailer, no sale.
Prices are increasing because of greed, instead of need.
It's true that the prices have risen over the past few years but the Electrocompaniet classic range was still far cheaper than it's sonic or build quality / design equivalent.
In the past Electrocompaniet equipment was sold far too cheaply to be taken seriously in the high end arena and was not flashy or fast changing enough for the midrange market that demands a new model on a regular basis to feed the insecurity of mid range box swappers, you could buy say an ECI5 integrated for 3 grand that out performed a 6 grand or more amp in all areas and was far better value for money, so why upgrade from it .
Electrocompaniet equipment was / is too good for it's own good in a nutshell .
Electro I understand the brand loyalty but I'm picking up some bitterness in your recent posts. Let me explain
The original per Abrahamsen went bust as he was not a good business man but made good amps. Was taken over so if the new businessman was not clever enough to change stategy that's his fault. I felt you had a dig at other quality brands that release more regular upgrades.
Another comment that I perceived as an unnecessary dig was the ' other speaker manufacturers that don't use transmission line design are taking the easy way out or selling out as if it's a fact that TL sounds/works better.
I'm not trying to cause a fight I'm just being straight forward.
I'm also not debating the quality of electro products either.
Electro said:Andrewjvt said:Electro said:plastic penguin said:Trouble is you can only make a profit if you have a turnover. If Electro's price point is higher than competitors, they lose out. It's simple business acumen.
The other problem is UK outlets -- over the last few years they have diminished. No retailer, no sale.
Prices are increasing because of greed, instead of need.
It's true that the prices have risen over the past few years but the Electrocompaniet classic range was still far cheaper than it's sonic or build quality / design equivalent.
In the past Electrocompaniet equipment was sold far too cheaply to be taken seriously in the high end arena and was not flashy or fast changing enough for the midrange market that demands a new model on a regular basis to feed the insecurity of mid range box swappers, you could buy say an ECI5 integrated for 3 grand that out performed a 6 grand or more amp in all areas and was far better value for money, so why upgrade from it .
Electrocompaniet equipment was / is too good for it's own good in a nutshell .
Electro I understand the brand loyalty but I'm picking up some bitterness in your recent posts. Let me explain
The original per Abrahamsen went bust as he was not a good business man but made good amps. Was taken over so if the new businessman was not clever enough to change stategy that's his fault. I felt you had a dig at other quality brands that release more regular upgrades.
Another comment that I perceived as an unnecessary dig was the ' other speaker manufacturers that don't use transmission line design are taking the easy way out or selling out as if it's a fact that TL sounds/works better.
I'm not trying to cause a fight I'm just being straight forward.
I'm also not debating the quality of electro products either.
No bitterness from me at all , it's all just my opinion for what it's worth.
I do think regular unnecessary model changes / casing tweeks are a little dishonest or misleading but at the end of the day it's the customers choice and if they want to spend their money that way then thats their prerogative.
You take great pains to point our products that you consider to be snake oil as is your right, and all I have done is to highlight a practise that I consider to be less than straightforward and a pure marketing exercise to boost sales that is of no benefit to the buyer imo .
As for the Transmission line thing I was just reacting to the rather scathing Alan Shaw article.
He made no mention of the decades of reasearch and development since the original TL speakers were designed.
If you want to hear from a real TL hater look for articles by John Atkinson.