Creek EVO 2 Vs Cambridge Audio Azur 640A V2

[admin_exported]

Dear Hi Fi Enthusiasts,

Anyone heard the creek EVO 2 performance? is it far better compare to CA Azur 640 A V2?

Does Creek Evo 2 considered a higher end amp compare to CA? & Both sound qualities is far apart?

Both Amps i suppose they wont have a problem driving a Floorstander with 20-150w or even 200w i suppose?

There is no review over at WHF for creek EVO so i wonder is it good? Cos a shop owner ever recommended this amp strongly to me but i decided to buy a CA 640 azur A V2 consider its power at 75W for future upgrading to floorstander and of course WHF gave a 5 star for it.

Is my choice wise?

Best Rgds,

Alvin Tay

 

[plastic penguin]

tayalvin:

Dear Hi Fi Enthusiasts,

Anyone heard the creek EVO 2 performance? is it far better compare to CA Azur 640 A V2?

Does Creek Evo 2 considered a higher end amp compare to CA? & Both sound qualities is far apart?

Both Amps i suppose they wont have a problem driving a Floorstander with 20-150w or even 200w i suppose?

There is no review over at WHF for creek EVO so i wonder is it good? Cos a shop owner ever recommended this amp strongly to me but i decided to buy a CA 640 azur A V2 consider its power at 75W for future upgrading to floorstander and of course WHF gave a 5 star for it.

Is my choice wise?

Best Rgds,

Alvin Tay

I posed a similar question a few weeks ago. I know the original Evo would run rings around the 640 V2, so you could assume the Evo MKII will extend the gap.

 

[matthewpiano]

You are talking about amps from two different price points. The 640A is excellent but the original Evo was, as PP says, in another league and, like PP, I would expect the Evo 2 to be a step forward again.

If you go for Creek amplification I'd strongly recommend looking at Epos speakers.

 

[Anonymous]

Thanks matthew,

understand you guys point here. they are both of different performance range.

best rgds

alvin