Jimboo
Well-known member
Good god , I hope the insides have more care and design than the outside. Absolutely vile.
I love my old Marantz cd52 ii's ..
I tried the Sa and Ki Ruby recently - I thought they were pretty poor to be honest
An important feature I look for, dating back to my experience of their CD-7 from 1998, is whether the product has availability of this DSP filtering (which HD-AMP1 has):
How it works for me, simply, is that I change the Filter to focus on voice or instrumentation e.g. 2/3 of the time I'm watching TV, using FIL 2 for English and Cantonese content, then FIL 1 for the sharper tones of Mandarin, Japanese, Korean. Similarly, when playing back music I change filters to suit how I…
I didn't I think the Ruby's are great.I tried the Sa and Ki Ruby recently - I thought they were pretty poor to be honest
Mods , can we have a " fan boy " section of the forum for stuff like this ?
I am grateful for Ken's contribution towards hi fi products but the " products" are the interest on here rather than a seemingly unhealthy ramblings of an obsessive. The minutae of his involvement in the development of marantz is strictly a niche market.
I fear we are providing an outlet for an unread blog.
Don't leave, Wil. I think you might be a little obsessive, but life would be dull if we were all the same.
Please remove the foreign language from your signature, thank you.Thanks… I'll disclose what I had privately said to you… Jimboo's objections were hilariously inept and an easy excuse for me to go focus awhile on other things.
Now, this vid has interview with core 3 members of present Marantz management team, promoting "Modern Musical Luxury" approach:
Obviously, for them, music matters somewhat less than before.
Publicly inciting resentment? Grate-work, though your discernment is evidently lacking, I'll stop contributing, leave.
Farewell.
Fear not, have fun making these fora in-your-own-image.
Please remove the foreign language from your signature, thank you.
I do know a good English approximation to Gracián's quote. However, I'm going to respect its original Spanish…
So, replacing with Russell.
As stated in another thread would you please remove your signature for, at least, translate it into English. Many thanks.
And Happy:
Riveting , I do hope that your obsessive love affair with marantz products will be more than an introduction to your personal obsession and a genuine bonus to the forum .
I fear that somewhere else told you to shove it and you fancy you have an audience here.
Hi Wil.
Alas their aesthetic hasn't gone down well here - see other post.
New Marantz pairing might divide opinion
Seeing the new Marantz Model 30 for the first time made me think the revised look might seriously divide opinions. What do you think? Me, I sort of like it but would have to see them ' in the flesh'. https://www.stereonet.co.uk/news/marantz-model-30-and-sacd-30n-unveiledforums.whathifi.com
This 30 & 30n, I'll especially caution those interested to audition first and not buy blind based on brand-reputation.
From the following interview, Joel Sietsema who "leads Marantz" directed the set's goals, thus, 30n's Jack of All Trades capacity:
Previously, in its Because Music Matters era, Ken championed simplicity:
Brand's present slogan is Modern Musical Luxury, and this reviewer opined about some feature's subpar performance:
Master of None may become the quip…
The Jack of All Trades nature will surely get the attention of those that relied on the likes of Oppo to do the job, it certainly got mine.
Power our Hi-Fi On some time before listening? Advice from their PM-14mkII User Manual:
View attachment 1569
I’ve never seen a believable reason other than the usual corporate stuff quoted a few posts back. As he sadly died so relatively soon afterwards, I wonder if he was already poorly, and agreed to leave for that reason.does anybody know the actual reason why he parted with marantz ?
I’ve never seen a believable reason other than the usual corporate stuff quoted a few posts back. As he sadly died so relatively soon afterwards, I wonder if he was already poorly, and agreed to leave for that reason.
He seemed to enjoy cigarettes, so may have had cancer, for example.
On another angle, I’m surprised Marantz never reverted to their roots, much as McIntosh has, by releasing some retro models. There was a fabulous tuner many years ago, and the Class A integrated (PM-4 was it?) which might appeal today.
I’ve never seen a believable reason other than the usual corporate stuff quoted a few posts back. As he sadly died so relatively soon afterwards, I wonder if he was already poorly, and agreed to leave for that reason.
He seemed to enjoy cigarettes, so may have had cancer, for example.
On another angle, I’m surprised Marantz never reverted to their roots, much as McIntosh has, by releasing some retro models. There was a fabulous tuner many years ago, and the Class A integrated (PM-4 was it?) which might appeal today.
thats a class looking amplifier and some interesting information. i wonder if it applies to other manufacturers amplifiers ?
i wonder if it applies to other manufacturers amplifiers ?
Good Lord, he's boring to listen to!
He certainly does.