6th.replicant said:spockfish said:Oh one more thing: friday I'm going to attent an event in the Netherlands organized by Linn Records where mr. Philip Hobbs (aka "the man with the golden ears") will attend and tell about how things work with respect to the recording process within Linn Records. The perfect time and place to ask him some questions I guess
Please ask Mr Hobbs how Linn Records justifies its 'golden' download prices, specifically why a 16/44 download costs more than the CD version? :shame:
For example, Melody Gardot's new album, The Absence, is £10 as a 16/44 from Linn or £8.99 as a CD from Amazon.co.uk :~
SteveD said:I bought the album on Linn download (24/96 FLAC converted to AIFF using XLD) and compared it one after the other with the 192kbps version I had already.
Couldn't tell a great difference between them although the 24/96 version sounds a bit more refined and you could only smell the ganja with the 24/96 version
Will I be rushing to buy more 24/96 material? No, because I don't think there is a huge difference between 256kbps (or actually even betweeen 192kbps) and the 24/96 version takes up 130MB per track vs approx 6MB per track on a 256kbps version and I use a Solid State Drive (because it is completely silent and fast) so space matters.
I think, on balance, lossless at around 800kbps is probably indistinguishable to my ears from higher res. versions so that's probably the extent I would go to.
In any case there isn't much on Linn records I would want to buy.
Thanks for the heads up though Cno, gave me another chance to play around and experiment and I don't regret the purchase at all.
paradiziac said:6th.replicant said:spockfish said:Oh one more thing: friday I'm going to attent an event in the Netherlands organized by Linn Records where mr. Philip Hobbs (aka "the man with the golden ears") will attend and tell about how things work with respect to the recording process within Linn Records. The perfect time and place to ask him some questions I guess
Please ask Mr Hobbs how Linn Records justifies its 'golden' download prices, specifically why a 16/44 download costs more than the CD version? :shame:
For example, Melody Gardot's new album, The Absence, is £10 as a 16/44 from Linn or £8.99 as a CD from Amazon.co.uk :~
£1.01 for the pleasure of express (i.e. immediate) delivery, time saved ripping the disc and physical space saved in storage.
Or, perhaps it is simply because enough folks are willing to pay that much...this thread being a case in point.
6th.replicant said:paradiziac said:6th.replicant said:spockfish said:Oh one more thing: friday I'm going to attent an event in the Netherlands organized by Linn Records where mr. Philip Hobbs (aka "the man with the golden ears") will attend and tell about how things work with respect to the recording process within Linn Records. The perfect time and place to ask him some questions I guess
Please ask Mr Hobbs how Linn Records justifies its 'golden' download prices, specifically why a 16/44 download costs more than the CD version? :shame:
For example, Melody Gardot's new album, The Absence, is £10 as a 16/44 from Linn or £8.99 as a CD from Amazon.co.uk :~
£1.01 for the pleasure of express (i.e. immediate) delivery, time saved ripping the disc and physical space saved in storage.
Or, perhaps it is simply because enough folks are willing to pay that much...this thread being a case in point.
Or "£1.01 for the pleasure of" no sleeve notes/nice-smelling-booklet/CD case and the faff of burning a backup to disc (as recommended by Linn), which takes longer than ripping a CD to iTunes.
manicm said:SteveD said:I bought the album on Linn download (24/96 FLAC converted to AIFF using XLD) and compared it one after the other with the 192kbps version I had already.
Couldn't tell a great difference between them although the 24/96 version sounds a bit more refined and you could only smell the ganja with the 24/96 version
Will I be rushing to buy more 24/96 material? No, because I don't think there is a huge difference between 256kbps (or actually even betweeen 192kbps) and the 24/96 version takes up 130MB per track vs approx 6MB per track on a 256kbps version and I use a Solid State Drive (because it is completely silent and fast) so space matters.
I think, on balance, lossless at around 800kbps is probably indistinguishable to my ears from higher res. versions so that's probably the extent I would go to.
In any case there isn't much on Linn records I would want to buy.
Thanks for the heads up though Cno, gave me another chance to play around and experiment and I don't regret the purchase at all.
Why did you convert the FLAC to AIFF? Ok, that's cos you have a Mac, but I wouldn't be surprised if the FLAC sounds better on a PC. Did the AIFF even preserve it as 24-bit? This is why I would never make such comparisons using a PC.
Mirren Boy said:Recommends that have a great sound on 24bit
The Bob Marley down load sounds wonderful.
Wilco latest album is another great sounding 24bit.
Recommends that have a great sound
The Doors - LA Woman 24bit
The Doors 24bit
Fleetwood Mac all their albums in 24bit
All The Beatles albums on 24 bit are the best recordings I have heard of them even over vinyl
Michal Jackson –Bad
Madona True Blue
Norah Jones – Littlie Broken Hearts
Linn recording – The Easy club – Folk album
Paul McCartney All what is out in 24bit
The ones that sound terrible on 24bit or just average
Nirvana
All talking heads albums
Rolling Stone albums