marb67 said:
Interesting points made but again it is all subjective. It's like no digital synth will be as warm, rich as a Moog. Analogue in electronic music will always blow away digital. That is how I thought regarding vinyl v digital in music.
Some of the vinyl from around the very early 70's sounds like an egg and bacon fry up due to poorer quality vinyl because of the Heath energy crisis. I am sure things are a lot better now.
This is an interesting article that states vynyl is better than digital:
http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/reasons-why-vinyl-better-digital/
I disagree about early 70s vinyl, thats when i started to buy it, it went down hill around the mid-late 70s, records got thinner, warped, less quality, in fact I took nearly all mine back and got refunds on them. I don't think it was anything to do with Ted Heath which was coal, it was to do with oil. Oil got more expensive, so did vinyl.
As for that article, think some of its rubbish, Taylor Swift was the biggest selling vinyl album in the USA in 2015. Most music sales are online. As for vinyl sounding exactly as good as the band intended, much of that is down to skill of the vinyl engineer, some are good some are bad, some are just taken from the digital master tapes, sound no better than the cd plus you have all the vinyl problems throw in. This guy does not know what hes talking about, he is just peddling what the young think. Half of which don't even play their records. Vinyl is compressed, otherwise it would not fit onto an lp, unless you only had about 10 minutes each side, and the needle would be jumping around.
If mp3 is so bad why can't people hear the difference?
http://www.music.mcgill.ca/~hockman/documents/Pras_presentation2009.pdf