Any thoughts on this machine as a one-box sollution. I'm thinking of (downgrading?) to it from Roksan Caspian MK1 original version 16 years old and Marantz Pearl-Lite SACD player. Any thoughts much appreciated.
tino said:No internet radio streaming apparently?!!?
expat_mike said:I don't think the missing internet radio is a big issue really[/b] - the days of hard coding internet streaming and internet radio into hifi equipment really should really be over. I think that most people find streaming music and radio from their phone/tablet/chromecast etc is much easier, and the app can be easily be upgraded - there is no need to return the hifi equipment to the manufacturer for a firmware upgrade.
manicm said:tino said:No internet radio streaming apparently?!!?
True, but then look at the price of an equivalent Naim or Cyrus and then ponder....
A significant omission however is the lack of DSD playback.
manicm said:tino said:No internet radio streaming apparently?!!?
True, but then look at the price of an equivalent Naim or Cyrus and then ponder....
A significant omission however is the lack of DSD playback.
cse said:Any thoughts on this machine as a one-box sollution. I'm thinking of (downgrading?) to it from Roksan Caspian MK1 original version 16 years old and Marantz Pearl-Lite SACD player. Any thoughts much appreciated.
plastic penguin said:cse said:Any thoughts on this machine as a one-box sollution. I'm thinking of (downgrading?) to it from Roksan Caspian MK1 original version 16 years old and Marantz Pearl-Lite SACD player. Any thoughts much appreciated.
Firstly, can I say I haven't heard the new Solo Music. The Caspian is 16 years old so I would guess the new Arcam should be at least on par if not a little better.
Secondly, It'll boil down to your speakers: Generally Arcams are great with PMC, MA, Focal...
Naim equivalent is very good but are, again generalising, speaker dependant. You'll need to dem the Arcam and see if it floats your boat.
plastic penguin said:cse said:Any thoughts on this machine as a one-box sollution. I'm thinking of (downgrading?) to it from Roksan Caspian MK1 original version 16 years old and Marantz Pearl-Lite SACD player. Any thoughts much appreciated.
Firstly, can I say I haven't heard the new Solo Music. The Caspian is 16 years old so I would guess the new Arcam should be at least on par if not a little better.
Secondly, It'll boil down to your speakers: Generally Arcams are great with PMC, MA, Focal...
Naim equivalent is very good but are, again generalising, speaker dependant. You'll need to dem the Arcam and see if it floats your boat.
Al ears said:plastic penguin said:cse said:Any thoughts on this machine as a one-box sollution. I'm thinking of (downgrading?) to it from Roksan Caspian MK1 original version 16 years old and Marantz Pearl-Lite SACD player. Any thoughts much appreciated.
Firstly, can I say I haven't heard the new Solo Music. The Caspian is 16 years old so I would guess the new Arcam should be at least on par if not a little better.
Secondly, It'll boil down to your speakers: Generally Arcams are great with PMC, MA, Focal...
Naim equivalent is very good but are, again generalising, speaker dependant. You'll need to dem the Arcam and see if it floats your boat.
'Age will not weary them'....
These amps do not suffer with time. They are either good or they're not.
The lack of modern facilities is what's going to let this Arcam down, which is rather stupid as they know what they're up against. If you're going to produce an 'all in one' then you better make sure it is just that.
But then again,whoever is into hifi is going to listen to internet radio ffs?
plastic penguin said:Al ears said:plastic penguin said:cse said:Any thoughts on this machine as a one-box sollution. I'm thinking of (downgrading?) to it from Roksan Caspian MK1 original version 16 years old and Marantz Pearl-Lite SACD player. Any thoughts much appreciated.
Firstly, can I say I haven't heard the new Solo Music. The Caspian is 16 years old so I would guess the new Arcam should be at least on par if not a little better.
Secondly, It'll boil down to your speakers: Generally Arcams are great with PMC, MA, Focal...
Naim equivalent is very good but are, again generalising, speaker dependant. You'll need to dem the Arcam and see if it floats your boat.
'Age will not weary them'....
These amps do not suffer with time. They are either good or they're not.
The lack of modern facilities is what's going to let this Arcam down, which is rather stupid as they know what they're up against. If you're going to produce an 'all in one' then you better make sure it is just that.
But then again,whoever is into hifi is going to listen to internet radio ffs?
That's not what I'm saying Al. I would like to think that after a decade and a half the technology or the means to provide a cleaner sounding amp has been adopted by these manufacturers. So for instance I hope the last MKI Caspian, the one I heard, is better than a 16-year oild version.
If Arcam are adopting the Class G amplification, as used in the newest FMJ range, then it should be in the same ballpark as a 16-year old Roksan.
The OP hasn't mentioned anything about facilities, so perhaps his priority is the ease of a one-box solution.
cse said:Thanks for all the replys, ailthough I don't understand many of them. What other one-box unit provides all of this for £1500? What I want essentially is excellent CD playback (SACD is vastly overrated), FM and DAB (although I can't receive most stations) and good amplification. I listen almost exclusively to classical music and have Neat Petit SX speakers. Also, I want to trade-in my Roksan and Marantz at the same time. I don't think I want internet radio, but I might want to try streaming a classical music service in the future, but I will probably tire of this idea quite quickly.
bonenut said:i have one and love it,its perfect for my bedroom listening.i bought the arcam alto speakers as well(i think they came with it originally)the whole package second hand was 500euro.
i never bothered with the dab radio,just fm and cd and chromecast audio.the amplifier is excellent and seems a lot more powerful than 50watts....they only thing i missed which is a vey small negative was a proper volume pot and the buttons are hard to read.
all in all a terrific player and would never get rid of it.
Al ears said:bonenut said:i have one and love it,its perfect for my bedroom listening.i bought the arcam alto speakers as well(i think they came with it originally)the whole package second hand was 500euro.
i never bothered with the dab radio,just fm and cd and chromecast audio.the amplifier is excellent and seems a lot more powerful than 50watts....they only thing i missed which is a vey small negative was a proper volume pot and the buttons are hard to read.
all in all a terrific player and would never get rid of it.
I believe the OP is asking about the new one.
sorry.mind you if its anyway as good as the older versions it will be great.
cse said:Arcam solo music has arrived and am listening to Beethoven symphony no 5 (anima eterna period instruments) on it now. So far extremely pleased. It sounds very crisp, detailed and full-bodied and powerful. Only heard cd, fm and dab so far. Haven't ventured into setting up quboz yet, as I've no idea how to do it. Only problem is that it doesn't recognise any hybrid sacd's and rejects them as a bad disc. Strange as its an sacd player and arc am assured my dealer that it had sorted out earlier software problems!
plastic penguin said:Sounds encouraging cse. I toyed with the notion of buying the older Solo Neo but decided against an all-in-one. Always loved the understated Arcam presentation. Great for long sessions.
plastic penguin said:Always loved the understated Arcam presentation. Great for long sessions.