Accuphase E-360 or E-260

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the What HiFi community: the world's leading independent guide to buying and owning hi-fi and home entertainment products.

CnoEvil

New member
Aug 21, 2009
556
13
0
Visit site
NSA_watch_my_toilet said:
Oh yeah, and I'm a new member. Hello guy's ! Yes I'm a woman, but I warn you, I'm only here for speaking about hifi. Be clearly aware of that !

That was quite an entrance........welcome to the forum btw.

We need a knowledgeable woman on here to keep us in check, so I hope you stick around.

:cheers:

Cno
 

Macspur

Well-known member
May 3, 2010
843
3
18,540
Visit site
NSA_watch_my_toilet said:
Hello Hifidivided.

I speacially register under this page to talk with you. I know it's difficult to find good informations on the web and particulary for those kind of question, it need answer from persons that tried out those things.

I'm making different tests since the middle of fall 2012, and I compared the Accuphase e-260 with the e-360 and against other opponents from other brands like luxman, mc intosh, audia, leema, atc, accustic arts, goldmund and others... The tests was made in a professionnal recording studio in my neighborhood. A near perfectly treated accoustic room. I always used the same speakers and the same CD Player, for putting out the factor that could come from the dac of the cd player. Only exception was with the Luxman L-505ux and the L-550ax that was feeded with their own luxman cd player. Mostly, the cd player was an accuphase dp400 and the speakers was a B&W804d and a Xavian XN270. All the current was filtered.

I will recommend you to be happy with the E-260. Why ? Because you will need a KILLER ROOM to hear a little-tiny-thing-so-difficult-to-identify-that-you-will-believe-it's-psycho-accustic. Really, a lot of times, I believed I was confronted to psychological differences and had hard time to point out what will be very different between both. I could, after a long period, point out that some details fly a little bit better in the room with the E-360. The dynamic was minimalisticly more fine on the E-360, but, all those "better qualities" are so difficult to point out as if you analyse the exact flying pattern of two 9mm bullets fired from a gun.

The seller gave the one good advice. It's to never put the E-260 on speakers that are needing currents less than 4 ohms. Because he don't like that.

Another bad point of the E-260 in regard of the E-360, are the little pusher plastic buttons, that are more fragile than those on the E-360, that are standard. So, If you plan to play a lot with them, you will need to beware of that because the probability of a break in ten or twenty years is existing.

Actually, in Europe, there is a serious problem of reliability of the ..60 serie of accuphase too. I'm on different forum, and, simultanously, more persons than usual started to complain about problems with their new ..60. Often, it's humming or background noise, sometimes it's bad mounted vu-meter needle, sometime it's... simple breakdown. Be aware of that if you choose to turn yourself for a used one.

I hope it could help you out.

-------------

Then, other brands was recommended to you by other forumers. But all of them, although Luxman, have their own way to make sound. This is nuances but it will really depend about your tastes.

The Luxman L-505ux, for example, was (a bit) cheaper as the Accuphase E-260, and was equipped with a built in phono pre that is not bad. But he was flatter in the dynamic. He wasn't able to allow me to listen to some details of an accustic guitar player., The curve of the guitar strings was sharply followed and retraced by the accuphase, the luxman stopped before that and give "the great part of it". The toms of a drum wasn't so deep on the l-505ux. You could really listen to the end of the recording room with the e-260. Some details, when a lot of details came together, was simplified with the l-505ux, but they was clearly defined one in the other, when the e-260 was playing. The bass was less deep with the luxman as with the accuphase. Both musical scene was large and the artists takes position on those.

But this are all details, if you like it more "laid back", this tendence to not show you the last inch of detail could clearly be your cup of tea and make the Luxman interesting for you. In the other way, if you like this "closer to reallity" feeling of the accuphase, go for it.

Bad thing about the luxman :

-The volume knob is of awful quality and is nothing like a japanese brand, renowned for that, should make. It's a tiny film of aluminium that is layered on a plastic button. The way it gives volume is bad made too, 75% of the sound volume came in the 1/2 position, so you loose the run of the other half.

- the prices of Luxman are raising so high that they doubled of price in less than 5 years.

-------

Oh yeah, and I'm a new member. Hello guy's ! Yes I'm a woman, but I warn you, I'm only here for speaking about hifi. Be clearly aware of that !

Regardless of what gender you are, wow! what a superb insightful write up... the best piece I've read on here for ages, thank you.

Mac
 

Exoticsounds

New member
Jan 1, 2013
16
0
0
Visit site
You might also give Marantz PM-11S3 a listen, its a gem of an amp with a great phono stage. (MM/MC)

http://www.marantz.co.uk/uk/Products/Pages/ProductDetails.aspx?CatId=hifi&SubCatId=Amplifier&ProductId=PM11S3
 

Covenanter

Well-known member
Jul 20, 2012
85
29
18,570
Visit site
Macspur said:
NSA_watch_my_toilet said:
Hello Hifidivided.

I speacially register under this page to talk with you. I know it's difficult to find good informations on the web and particulary for those kind of question, it need answer from persons that tried out those things.

I'm making different tests since the middle of fall 2012, and I compared the Accuphase e-260 with the e-360 and against other opponents from other brands like luxman, mc intosh, audia, leema, atc, accustic arts, goldmund and others... The tests was made in a professionnal recording studio in my neighborhood. A near perfectly treated accoustic room. I always used the same speakers and the same CD Player, for putting out the factor that could come from the dac of the cd player. Only exception was with the Luxman L-505ux and the L-550ax that was feeded with their own luxman cd player. Mostly, the cd player was an accuphase dp400 and the speakers was a B&W804d and a Xavian XN270. All the current was filtered.

I will recommend you to be happy with the E-260. Why ? Because you will need a KILLER ROOM to hear a little-tiny-thing-so-difficult-to-identify-that-you-will-believe-it's-psycho-accustic. Really, a lot of times, I believed I was confronted to psychological differences and had hard time to point out what will be very different between both. I could, after a long period, point out that some details fly a little bit better in the room with the E-360. The dynamic was minimalisticly more fine on the E-360, but, all those "better qualities" are so difficult to point out as if you analyse the exact flying pattern of two 9mm bullets fired from a gun.

The seller gave the one good advice. It's to never put the E-260 on speakers that are needing currents less than 4 ohms. Because he don't like that.

Another bad point of the E-260 in regard of the E-360, are the little pusher plastic buttons, that are more fragile than those on the E-360, that are standard. So, If you plan to play a lot with them, you will need to beware of that because the probability of a break in ten or twenty years is existing.

Actually, in Europe, there is a serious problem of reliability of the ..60 serie of accuphase too. I'm on different forum, and, simultanously, more persons than usual started to complain about problems with their new ..60. Often, it's humming or background noise, sometimes it's bad mounted vu-meter needle, sometime it's... simple breakdown. Be aware of that if you choose to turn yourself for a used one.

I hope it could help you out.

-------------

Then, other brands was recommended to you by other forumers. But all of them, although Luxman, have their own way to make sound. This is nuances but it will really depend about your tastes.

The Luxman L-505ux, for example, was (a bit) cheaper as the Accuphase E-260, and was equipped with a built in phono pre that is not bad. But he was flatter in the dynamic. He wasn't able to allow me to listen to some details of an accustic guitar player., The curve of the guitar strings was sharply followed and retraced by the accuphase, the luxman stopped before that and give "the great part of it". The toms of a drum wasn't so deep on the l-505ux. You could really listen to the end of the recording room with the e-260. Some details, when a lot of details came together, was simplified with the l-505ux, but they was clearly defined one in the other, when the e-260 was playing. The bass was less deep with the luxman as with the accuphase. Both musical scene was large and the artists takes position on those.

But this are all details, if you like it more "laid back", this tendence to not show you the last inch of detail could clearly be your cup of tea and make the Luxman interesting for you. In the other way, if you like this "closer to reallity" feeling of the accuphase, go for it.

Bad thing about the luxman :

-The volume knob is of awful quality and is nothing like a japanese brand, renowned for that, should make. It's a tiny film of aluminium that is layered on a plastic button. The way it gives volume is bad made too, 75% of the sound volume came in the 1/2 position, so you loose the run of the other half.

- the prices of Luxman are raising so high that they doubled of price in less than 5 years.

-------

Oh yeah, and I'm a new member. Hello guy's ! Yes I'm a woman, but I warn you, I'm only here for speaking about hifi. Be clearly aware of that !

Regardless of what gender you are, wow! what a superb insightful write up... the best piece I've read on here for ages, thank you.

Mac

Yep I agree, interesting report of first-hand experience.

Chris
 

hifidivided

New member
Aug 3, 2013
8
0
0
Visit site
Hello NSA,

Thanks for the detailed write up on your experiences. And as stated before... gender is irrelevant!!

I will very soon get to demo the e360 at home so I am curious to see how it goes. It's worrying to hear that there have been production issues with the new ..60. Which forum are these issues being discussed? I'd be curious to read about what these people have experienced.

I will also soon listen to a bladelius thor. It seems that much of this amp is geared towards home cinema / digital gadgets etc etc. Not sure if thats just how its being advertised but there seems to be enogh happy users out there.

My current floorstanding speakers are rated at 4 ohm and 87 db sensitivity.
 

NSA_watch_my_toilet

New member
Aug 24, 2013
7
0
0
Visit site
"Which forum are these issues being discussed?"

Hello again. You will find a post about this theme under the Homecinema.fr.com forum:

http://www.homecinema-fr.com/forum/sources-integrees-haute-fidelite/les-nouvelles-accuphase-t29836516-3960.html

(watch lycan's statement, he's a well connected hifi enthousiast)

On Hifi-forum.de, but it's very difficult to find all because the thread is gigantic, I just putted some links :

http://www.hifi-forum.de/viewthread-108-2318-127.html

http://www.hifi-forum.de/viewthread-108-2318-119.html

You find other reports on audiofanzine :

http://fr.audiofanzine.com/ampli-hifi/accuphase/e360/forums/t.521017,attention-problemes-sur-les-dernieres-series-e360-de-accuphase.html

This is all what I could found "quickly". Hope your tests are going well. :cheers:
 

hifidivided

New member
Aug 3, 2013
8
0
0
Visit site
Yes, news indeed!

I would be the first to jump on alternative to the over-priced accuphase amplifiers but for (and it's an important "for me" ) these new E-..60 models that I have heard all sound good. Comparing the 360 over the 260 there does seem to be an audiable difference. Enough to try and twist finances to afford the bigger model. WIth the dynaudio speakers the 360 brought out finer detail and better grip on low end. Not a huge difference but with playing records that are very familiar to my ears there was a noticable difference. And unfortunatly... having heard that difference means I want the better sound machine!

I could find NO flaws in the 260 though. A fantastic sounding amp! It's just that the 360 does do it a little bit better.

I was testing on low to medium volumes in a small space and only vinyl records as source. In case it makes a difference to anyone.

The Bladelius thor 3 sounded amazing too! If I had not been shown an Accuphase earlier in the year I would probably be sitting at home raving on about how great sounding the Thor3 is. If I'm honest... part of the attraction with the Accuphase is that I feel, apart from how it sounds, that I am "going safe" and investing in something that hopefully will last longer than anything else I would put my money towards. I have no idea if there is any truth in that but that's how I feel anyways!
 

Macspur

Well-known member
May 3, 2010
843
3
18,540
Visit site
hifidivided said:
Yes, news indeed!

I would be the first to jump on alternative to the over-priced accuphase amplifiers but for (and it's an important "for me" ) these new E-..60 models that I have heard all sound good. Comparing the 360 over the 260 there does seem to be an audiable difference. Enough to try and twist finances to afford the bigger model. WIth the dynaudio speakers the 360 brought out finer detail and better grip on low end. Not a huge difference but with playing records that are very familiar to my ears there was a noticable difference. And unfortunatly... having heard that difference means I want the better sound machine!

I could find NO flaws in the 260 though. A fantastic sounding amp! It's just that the 360 does do it a little bit better.

I was testing on low to medium volumes in a small space and only vinyl records as source. In case it makes a difference to anyone.

The Bladelius thor 3 sounded amazing too! If I had not been shown an Accuphase earlier in the year I would probably be sitting at home raving on about how great sounding the Thor3 is. If I'm honest... part of the attraction with the Accuphase is that I feel, apart from how it sounds, that I am "going safe" and investing in something that hopefully will last longer than anything else I would put my money towards. I have no idea if there is any truth in that but that's how I feel anyways!

Excellent! I don't blame you for going for the more expensive model, especially if it controls your Dyns that bit more.

I think you can rest easy on the reliability of Accuphase too... fantastically well machined amps.

Please keep in touch as and when you actually buy the E360.

Mac
 

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts