A V AMP THAT SOUNDS GOOD WITH MUSIC

rock15

New member
Aug 7, 2010
25
0
0
Visit site
Hi everyone i am looking for an a v amp that will give good stereo sound as well as good surround sound, i have my speakers which is a monitor audio bx 5 5.1 setup and a sony 790 bd player to go with my panny 50 gt 30, i listen to rock and pop mostly through c/ds and an ipod through my marantz cd6004 my room is 16x12 and i have a budget of 600.00 ,can anyone sujest a sutible av amp thanks.
 
None of the AV amps will beat the Rotel, although Yamaha & Denon will run it close. Make sure you buy one with analogue pre-outs which will enable you to connect your Rotel to the amp if you're not happy with the musicality of the AV amp.
 

RobinKidderminster

New member
May 27, 2009
582
0
0
Visit site
Ok BB! Ive heard this b4. Out of interest I wonder why? I would hope a £1000 av would beat a £250 amp musically. Is it because an av has different amplification or are they over processed for music? What makes an amp more musical than an av receiver? I am not arguing since many agree and I have no peraonal experience. Cheers
 
RobinKidderminster said:
Ok BB! Ive heard this b4. Out of interest I wonder why? I would hope a £1000 av would beat a £250 amp musically. Is it because an av has different amplification or are they over processed for music? What makes an amp more musical than an av receiver? I am not arguing since many agree and I have no peraonal experience. Cheers

I was part of the "Big Question" feature in the mag more than 2 years ago. The Rotel RA-04SE was tested against the Denon 1910, Denon 2310 & Sony STR-DA5400ES which was worth £1400 at the time. The Rotel was better than all of them.

I think the reason is that all the money you pay buying a stereo amplifier goes into audio components only. With an AV receiver, there is so much tech crammed along with video components, upscaling etc. (which costs money) that very little money goes for audio components. Obviously, the quality suffers. Also, theoretically, there is interference from video components in an AV receiver.
 

onlystyle

New member
Oct 27, 2012
43
0
0
Visit site
the problem is that you demande de most costly equipement in home theatre

the price from a your system going to increase with your demand of stereo ...that something i watched for many times now

good stereo performance is making the price high

nad anthem arcam all music first receivers

sorry you going to have to spend a little more money if you want decent stereo ...

this issue is discus by me on question for andy clough and musicraft
 

Native_bon

Well-known member
Nov 26, 2008
181
5
18,595
Visit site
I dnt agree with bigboss. Not all av recievers are bad at playing to channel music. Unless ur really into seroius listening of Hi res music the difference is not as much as people think. Am currently using A marantz Sr6003 av amp. I have put this aganist so many 2 channel amps & it just bests them hands dwn. Smooth, very musical & open full sound!!

If u look well soem Av amps are good at music. Its not the general rule anymore... Things have moved on. But if must get the 2 channel setup then get a 2 channel amp with a fix av input like biggboss explains.

All the best.
 

Thompsonuxb

New member
Feb 19, 2012
125
0
0
Visit site
Try a 500 poundish av amp, its a myth about the quality of av amps in stereo not being as good as dedicated stereo amps.

Apart from giving alot more options - anolog or digital inputs, They offer the novelty of DSP functions for your entertainment. Set up is important though to get the best from them, turn all unused channels off, ensure speaker size is set to large and low frequencies are sent to the fronts. And if you want to really listen turn off the DSP effects. You can also bi-amp or bi-wire your front speakers.

AV amps usually have power supplys capable of handling at least 5.1 times 50wpc - it'll handle the dynamic swings in any music you present to it in stereo with more than enough head room.

in my experience while stereo amps do go louder (shouty) a well sorted av amp controls speakers better, you may be impressed with the stereo amp in a short test/demo but in a domestic set up av amps sound fine.

Yamaha usually do AV amps that are very capable in stereo.

I Have a Rotel ra - 1520 and an old Yamaha ax-620....... The yamaha sounds better in stereo....maybe its preference though.
 

rock15

New member
Aug 7, 2010
25
0
0
Visit site
Thanks for that im lookin at the yam rx v673 but thinking about going up to the yamaha dsp-ax863se at £600.00, theres also a sony and pioneer and onkyo within my budget will give them a listen to .what do you rhink of these.
 

Ben K.

New member
Nov 6, 2010
54
0
0
Visit site
I have directly compared my Yamaha rxv2065 and my old arcam a75 amp in 2 channel stereo and IMO the arcam wins hands down hence why I used it in av bypass for a long while.

Everybody is entitled to their own opinion and at the end of the day what ever sounds best to you is what you should buy.

Just be warned people are very biased one way or the other and so it really is best to listen and judge for yourself.
 

Tuz

New member
Feb 2, 2009
18
0
0
Visit site
I have recently upgraded my Denon 1910 to the Yamaha RX-V673 and the upgrade in 2 channel music is very noticable.

I have B&W M1 (x5) and a BK XLS200 sub and have set my front speakers to small and listen in 2.1. I have used the microphone to calibrate the speakers and there is a marked improvement.

MP3 quality music is ok but there is a large jump up when I listen to FLAC or CDs, even via my PS3. Even digital radio via freeview sounds better with the yamaha.

I watch a lot of blu rays and play games so an AV amp is essential - if I had the space I would prefer a separate hifi set up but think I have the best set up for a small-ish (4m x 4m) room.
 

Thompsonuxb

New member
Feb 19, 2012
125
0
0
Visit site
rock15 said:
Thanks for that im lookin at the yam rx v673 but thinking about going up to the yamaha dsp-ax863se at £600.00, theres also a sony and pioneer and onkyo within my budget will give them a listen to .what do you rhink of these.

I'm currently considering the RX673 myself. (trading the ra-1520)

I have no experience with the other amps, but like I've said don't dimiss the ability of these amps in 2 channel stereo, also if your CD player has a digital out (coax), use it (its usually a better output than the anolog outs...... compare them, you'll see.)
 

Pistol Pete1

New member
Jan 27, 2008
248
1
0
Visit site
If your serious about 2 channel music, I defo go with BB's idea of getting an av amp with pre outs. Your Rotel is a good amp, why waste it!

I've added, via pre outs, a Marantz PM6004 to my award winning (2010) Denon AVR 2310 (£800) recently, and not looked back!
 

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts