Well, 47.3% to be precise. In a poll which I cannot link to as it is on another forum the following questions were asked;
FLAC ripped directly from CD always sounds noticably better 24.3%
I can distinguish a FLAC file as superior, after much time spent A/B-ing 27%
I cannot tell a difference 99% of the time 47.3%
192kbps mp3's sound superior - I love muddy transients and artificial highs!!! 1.3%
Total of 222 votes so far. (percentages rounded to nearest 0.1)
The general consensus from the rest of the thread was that kit was way more important. A lot of people admitted to importing CDs ast lossless rates even though they were in the 47% group. The forum where the poll was held is very much a hifi one.
So, how would you vote? (I am one of the 47%)
FLAC ripped directly from CD always sounds noticably better 24.3%
I can distinguish a FLAC file as superior, after much time spent A/B-ing 27%
I cannot tell a difference 99% of the time 47.3%
192kbps mp3's sound superior - I love muddy transients and artificial highs!!! 1.3%
Total of 222 votes so far. (percentages rounded to nearest 0.1)
The general consensus from the rest of the thread was that kit was way more important. A lot of people admitted to importing CDs ast lossless rates even though they were in the 47% group. The forum where the poll was held is very much a hifi one.
So, how would you vote? (I am one of the 47%)