- Aug 10, 2019
- 2,556
- 5
- 0
gordy.t said:Hi all, new on here and looking for any thoughts or suggestions on the shortlist of speakers i'm considering to replace my current speakers (Monitor Audio RX8) i've been looking at PMC OB1i, GamuT Phi5, Monitor Audio GX300. I will be hooking them up to 4 Avi monoblocs so they must be at least bi-wire. I have not heard any of these speakers yet so i would be interested in anyone's opinions who has experience of the speakers i've mentioned or others worth considering, thanks.
sorry, messed up first post:doh:
Meridian G08.2 cd player, Avi S2000 pre amp, 4 x Avi S2000 monoblocs, Monitor Audio RX 8 speakers.
sounds promising, looking to audition these very shortly, how did you find the bass definition(detail, tightness, depth) as i thought the RX8's could sound a bit muddy in the bass compared to their top end.hifilover1979 said:GX300's are stunning..
Heard these with the Cyrus mono's (X300's I think) and the Audiolab mono's and the soundstage was just superb... Speakers were only 30hours old as well so they could only get better IMO; looked gorgeous too!
gordy.t said:Hi all, new on here and looking for any thoughts or suggestions on the shortlist of speakers i'm considering to replace my current speakers (Monitor Audio RX8) i've been looking at PMC OB1i, GamuT Phi5, Monitor Audio GX300. I will be hooking them up to 4 Avi monoblocs so they must be at least bi-wire. I have not heard any of these speakers yet so i would be interested in anyone's opinions who has experience of the speakers i've mentioned or others worth considering, thanks.
sorry, messed up first post:doh:
Meridian G08.2 cd player, Avi S2000 pre amp, 4 x Avi S2000 monoblocs, Monitor Audio RX 8 speakers.
gordy.t said:sounds promising, looking to audition these very shortly, how did you find the bass definition(detail, tightness, depth) as i thought the RX8's could sound a bit muddy in the bass compared to their top end.hifilover1979 said:GX300's are stunning..
Heard these with the Cyrus mono's (X300's I think) and the Audiolab mono's and the soundstage was just superb... Speakers were only 30hours old as well so they could only get better IMO; looked gorgeous too!
FrankHarveyHiFi said:It's worth throwing in the KEF R900's in my opinion as they sound quite different to the Reference models. Their sound is balanced more like the Blades, which is a more accessible sound to many than the Reference. Just a few recommendations to be getting on with 🙂
CnoEvil said:FrankHarveyHiFi said:It's worth throwing in the KEF R900's in my opinion as they sound quite different to the Reference models. Their sound is balanced more like the Blades, which is a more accessible sound to many than the Reference. Just a few recommendations to be getting on with 🙂
David, just out of interest, could you elaborate a little more on these differences. I have briefly heard the R700s, though it was not long enough for a proper assessment (and different room/equipment etc didn't help). How close to the Ref line to they get? Apologies to OP for any slight diversion Cheers Cno
FrankHarveyHiFi said:That hasn't really answered the question, has it? 🙂
CnoEvil said:I was really looking for insights on how the "Blade Technology" had changed the sound (upper mid and treble, and how that differed from that of the the Refs). The R700s sounded well being driven by amplification that imo would not have worked with the Refs.
FrankHarveyHiFi said:Might be worth a thread on its own? Partly so as not to take over this one, but also so I don't get in trouble 🙂