Oh good, another ill informed, incoherent rant!
You're still yet to discover paragraphs I notice...
Again there is a problem about streaming the minimum for netlix ( streaming ) is that it will not get out of bed is less than 30mps Only need to have 2 people in the same house either streaming vids or games to have a slowing down problem (hence why so many buy 4k dvds) Would not matter whether had a plasma or not . Ideally need at least 70 mps .
Nope, 4K/UHD only requires 15Mbps as others have said.
We live in rural areas and sorry to say . what we want here ,we cannot have why ? because Giga clear ? is not allowed by BT/Sky to get a foothold in this road we live in.That is too say the parent company needs there permission to use there space.
Firstly, BT or Sky has no sway in who operates where.
The Likes of OFCOM and the CMA would have something to say about it if they did.
Secondly BT and Sky don't have any "Space". The "last mile" infrastructure they use is owned and operated by Openreach.
yes they could dig up the road again and close parts of it , to do the work. Having spoken to the manager of "Giga" , while he was doing a survey. He said same problem Openreach We need there permission to share the same space. I said all they have to do is having a nice relationship ,where everyone gets along nicely Openreach charges you guys a charge of using it
As part of the incumbent (BT Group), Openreach are obliged by the regulator to allow access to their "passive infrastructure' (poles, ducts and foot/roadway boxes) to "Altnets" via the PIA (Passive Infrastructure Agreement) scheme to run their cables.
Yes it's essentially a licensing scheme with prices set by the regulator, but it's considerably cheaper than Altnets having to do their own civils.
As a commercial entity, busy investing billions upgrading their own infrastructure, why shouldn't they charge other companies for access?
Particulary when it isn't reciprocal.
VM and the Altnets are not obliged to allow Openreach to use their infrastructure....