Which gives better audio 24/192 FLAC or DSD 5.6

cookiemonsteruk

Well-known member
Jul 14, 2024
43
19
45
I have read so many opinions on this one so its probably a matter of personal preference but which has the better audio quality especially relating to classical music. Thanks
 
The only way to know for sure is to blind test it for yourself,.

But given most people can't even distinguish between lossy and losslessly encoded tracks under blind conditions, the chances of being able to perceive a difference between "hi res" formats is going to be remote to non-existant...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DougK1
I would agree to a point. I have a couple of piano pieces recorded in six format levels including DSD and, although technically DSD should be better and is the standard format for many producers it is pretty much indistinguishable aurally over and above any hi res FLAC formats.
Perhaps if I had a super expensive DAC I might state otherwise but I doubt it.
Try downloading a series of free test recordings from Blue Coast Music and see for yourself.
 
I have read so many opinions on this one so its probably a matter of personal preference but which has the better audio quality especially relating to classical music. Thanks

The Vinyl version sounds the best 😉


No in all seriousness if you want to play about do so, its not as if you'll be throwing thousands down the drain to buy media.

I personally struggle to hear any differences between formats let along 192 and DSD, but look, this is part of the fun of the hobby, try it out and see what you think!
 
Recording / Mastering more important than PCM or DSD or Format
Superb 16/44 CD mastered by bernie grundman will sound better than 24/192 FLAC or DSD 5.6
Best classical sound 1950/1960 LP from Decca , Coulmbia Argo or Everest recorded to 35mm film
 

TRENDING THREADS