FrankHarveyHiFi:
Tom Moreno:In this lowest setting the overall integrity of the sound track is well preserved with a minimal amount of compression used on the widest dynamic shifts. In other words I can watch, and enjoy, a very dynamic movie without having to jockey the volume on the remote and without eliciting complaints from the wife or waking the baby
This I see as 'tinkering' with what the Director has originally intended as far as the audio track is concerned. Taking out the full dynamics can change the tone of a film. If you've ever watched the likes of Halloween or Terminator 2 on TV, you'll know what I mean. On TV they have all the impact of the Tweenies.
In a perfect world I would agree with you 100%. If I were a bachelor I would use only the surround decoding and listen at a much higher level. However circumstances change and, while is still do watch movies without processing, limiting myself to only being able to watch a film under perfect conditions would mean that I might only be able to do so on a Saturday afternoon once every other week or so. With the use of these technologies you still get a very reasonable presentation that has depth and impact and I can watch a film under these conditions up to midnight any day of the week. I love watching films and, on average, will regularly watch 6 films a week so cutting myself down to the only times I can do so without upsetting everyone in the house would be an extreme hinderance and would probably be less enjoyable than having a slight amount of compression on the soundtrack. All I am saying is that for those of us that need some sort of compromise, the Audyssey system (as implemented by Denon) is by far the least invasive sounding that gives you the most effective results out there.