Hi all,
In my setup, I have a Bluesound Node (N130) which does full MQA (in principle) but has a somewhat average DAC.
On the other end, I have a SMSL D300 DAC, which does NOT do MQA, but has a more "natural" sound.
So I am debating: in princple, which one should bring most details out:
1. Bluesound Node -> analog on amp (with Bluesound doing full MQA)
or
2. Bluesound Now (1st unfold) -> SMSL D300 via USB
I have tried both, I do hear a slight nuance, but I can't say whether it's because there's more details, or only because the D300 is warmer in general.
I'm honestly only looking for some facts on the theory - which one should, in principle, be the right way?
Have you experimented something like that before? Should I just ditch MQA? If I do, I would then keep the setup as is - Node as a streamer only, D300 as the DAC. Then I can play my local 192kHz files in all their glory
Thanks,
Mrob
In my setup, I have a Bluesound Node (N130) which does full MQA (in principle) but has a somewhat average DAC.
On the other end, I have a SMSL D300 DAC, which does NOT do MQA, but has a more "natural" sound.
So I am debating: in princple, which one should bring most details out:
1. Bluesound Node -> analog on amp (with Bluesound doing full MQA)
or
2. Bluesound Now (1st unfold) -> SMSL D300 via USB
I have tried both, I do hear a slight nuance, but I can't say whether it's because there's more details, or only because the D300 is warmer in general.
I'm honestly only looking for some facts on the theory - which one should, in principle, be the right way?
Have you experimented something like that before? Should I just ditch MQA? If I do, I would then keep the setup as is - Node as a streamer only, D300 as the DAC. Then I can play my local 192kHz files in all their glory
Thanks,
Mrob