in searching for appropriate electronics for my kef r5.1 system i looked into a forum in whom following thinks been said
that it is a joke that human ears can hear the differences of speakers sounding with high or very high end amplification
(it is the same for high ended scad and cd players) let say classe or mackintosh compairing with cheap amplification
let say an av receiver costing 300 euro . a meaning that had been shared with many visistors
is all than measure differences that human can not hear ???
i was visiting a site (harmonique-blog) where the expert tested the kef r300 with high end and than with an onkyo 5009
he said that high end opened up much more the music, kept the bass reproduction much more controlled and tight and so
one there were the onkyo was making the music much more flat, not so detailed, dit not take advantge off the
speakers capacity
what do the forum visitors and the expert from whats hifi find ?
Are audiophiles than a type of guys believing in something they can not hear?
Thank you for your reactions
that it is a joke that human ears can hear the differences of speakers sounding with high or very high end amplification
(it is the same for high ended scad and cd players) let say classe or mackintosh compairing with cheap amplification
let say an av receiver costing 300 euro . a meaning that had been shared with many visistors
is all than measure differences that human can not hear ???
i was visiting a site (harmonique-blog) where the expert tested the kef r300 with high end and than with an onkyo 5009
he said that high end opened up much more the music, kept the bass reproduction much more controlled and tight and so
one there were the onkyo was making the music much more flat, not so detailed, dit not take advantge off the
speakers capacity
what do the forum visitors and the expert from whats hifi find ?
Are audiophiles than a type of guys believing in something they can not hear?
Thank you for your reactions