T
the record spot
Guest
aliEnRIK:
Strange answer spot
You originally attack me asking for some form of measureable evidence (well, at least in a round about way you were "Mate, seriously, the audible benefits are questionable in any case, but credibility you know? That's all I'm saying...!")
When I give some you say your not interested?
If I didnt know any better id say your main goal is simply to attack me where possible..............(Seems to be a common agenda on this site.........)
Oh dear, the paranoia police are in town. Please...
I see it's alright to peddle your POV, but I put up a light-hearted comment on your post and suddenly it's a threat...obviously. If you think that's what passes off as an attack on an internet forum, you've led a charmed life (my phrase of the month I think...). And on the wider scale, you're far from attacked on here, though God knows, if you want an easy ride, go sit on the Hoffman forum, there's any number who'll buy your line of reasoning without question on the Hardware sub-forum.
You made a statement around having measureable evidence on a physical change, fine, all I'm saying - as ever - is the audible benefits might well be so small as to be negligible to our hearing. Might not even have any impact at all, or it might be somewhere between the two. In the end, it proves what? That there's a physical change in the properties of a bit of wire and the resulting audio impacts are...subjective (and generous) at best.
Hence my scepticism - not a personal attack, just what could be taking 2+2 and passing it off as credible - not expecting a peer review here, just I haven't seen or heard anything that says or suggests a direct link.
Strange answer spot
You originally attack me asking for some form of measureable evidence (well, at least in a round about way you were "Mate, seriously, the audible benefits are questionable in any case, but credibility you know? That's all I'm saying...!")
When I give some you say your not interested?
If I didnt know any better id say your main goal is simply to attack me where possible..............(Seems to be a common agenda on this site.........)
Oh dear, the paranoia police are in town. Please...
I see it's alright to peddle your POV, but I put up a light-hearted comment on your post and suddenly it's a threat...obviously. If you think that's what passes off as an attack on an internet forum, you've led a charmed life (my phrase of the month I think...). And on the wider scale, you're far from attacked on here, though God knows, if you want an easy ride, go sit on the Hoffman forum, there's any number who'll buy your line of reasoning without question on the Hardware sub-forum.
You made a statement around having measureable evidence on a physical change, fine, all I'm saying - as ever - is the audible benefits might well be so small as to be negligible to our hearing. Might not even have any impact at all, or it might be somewhere between the two. In the end, it proves what? That there's a physical change in the properties of a bit of wire and the resulting audio impacts are...subjective (and generous) at best.
Hence my scepticism - not a personal attack, just what could be taking 2+2 and passing it off as credible - not expecting a peer review here, just I haven't seen or heard anything that says or suggests a direct link.