I'm not overly optimistic, but I was hoping that film club members would enjoy this film rather more than my previous two selections. It seems to me it's rather more accessible than LQV and The Trial, whilst still being incredibly rewarding if one wants to dig a little deeper. I say that because even I was able to follow the relatively straightforward narrative, but I get a strong sense it's a lot deeper than that in a way I don't understand!
I should start with an apology, as I'd proffered a selection of films I'd described as animations. It's many years since I saw this film, and whilst I'd enjoyed it enough to keep a copy on disc, my recollection was clearly mistaken. My retrospective explanation is that I watched it at a time before I'd paid much attention to concepts such as expressionist cinema and it's style and visuals are so striking and unusual that my brain wrongly remembered them as the striking and unusual images of animation. The only non-animated film that I can think of with reminiscent visuals is Sin City, although that's more consistently noir.
I was very taken with the look and feel of the film. I can now see just how much of an expressionist film it is, with the clearest and perhaps most effective example being when Mr TV strikes his son, causing him to fall to the floor and he appears in miniature, cowering at his feet, There were also some fairly classic noir images, such as the silhouettes chasing across angled corridors and stairs (this seemed reminiscent of a particular film to me but I couldn't think which, anyone any ideas?) or the shooting of machine guns into buildings. Despite having seen this type of image before, the film didn't feel derivative to me.
The point of expressionism, as I understand it, is to present a subjective and emotionally derived perspective. I thought this was done really well throughout, on a small and large scale. An example of the small scale was early on when the father says to the daughter 'don't feel GUILTY' (or similar, I didn't write that one down) and the last word is capitalised to show what the daughter is concentrating on and thinking about.
On a larger scale, the film is presenting a broad political, anti authoritarian message from a personal (three or four people) perspective. As strapped has already commented, the political message is pretty similar to the one in Metropolis. That probably presents anti-capitalist or anti-elitist argument (I'm sure I'm over-simplifying and doing it a disservice) whereas La Antena has those elements but is also affected by the second world war and the cold war. We see some fairly blatant Nazi / Jewish imagery (the bearded grandfather with the ID card and number, the blind boy being on a star of David, the rat wearing what looks like Nazi insignia, and even a swastika, merging into the antena) and Communist imagery (CCCP on the boy's helmet, a communist star on the father's).
I think having watched the film again that that message may be a little simple or obvious, but it has nuance through the metaphor of removing speech - and then removing even words - and some humour from more contemporary society (the dominance of TV and TV dinners, the little girl with the typewriter key head dancing manically like on one of those dance machines).
Ultimately, it seemed an incredibly original film to me, in style if not in theme, it was brilliantly and consistently realised by the filmmakers and the style and imagery fitted the message just as it should - a fusion of form and content, much like Metropolis. For example, the opening and closing image of disembodied hands playing a symphony and striking invisible typewriter keys is stunning visually and orally but links perfectly to the themes of removing speech, and words, and thus empowerment.
I'd made quite a lot more notes, so hopefully I have a few more things to chip in with as appropriate, but I'm sure that's more than enough for now!