gosalh said:One for Ric71 and Ricky Setup the analogue connections on my oppo 95. In terms of audio... For bluray: it no way beats my Denon A100. The Multeq xt32 is kicks ass and the sound processing on the Denon seems much wider and clearer. Bass on the Denon is tighter and deeper because of the xt32. For cd music: surprisingly the oppo's analogue sounded superior in this department. Much more depth, clarity and wider. to sum up... So i prefer hdmi and the denon for movies, and the oppo for music. Ive got both connections setup now. For the hdmi ive set dual connections. One connection dedicated for video. The second is for audio/video. I was chatting to oppo support, and the engineer said that they will be releasing a firmware soon to allow the second hdmi connection to be dedicated to audio only. This should provide higher quality audio. But this will only be available on the oppo 95.
gosalh said:One for Ric71 and Ricky Setup the analogue connections on my oppo 95. In terms of audio... For bluray: it no way beats my Denon A100. The Multeq xt32 is kicks ass and the sound processing on the Denon seems much wider and clearer. Bass on the Denon is tighter and deeper because of the xt32. For cd music: surprisingly the oppo's analogue sounded superior in this department. Much more depth, clarity and wider. to sum up... So i prefer hdmi and the denon for movies, and the oppo for music. Ive got both connections setup now. For the hdmi ive set dual connections. One connection dedicated for video. The second is for audio/video. I was chatting to oppo support, and the engineer said that they will be releasing a firmware soon to allow the second hdmi connection to be dedicated to audio only. This should provide higher quality audio. But this will only be available on the oppo 95.
collywobbles said:Some photos as promised, with and without grills. Yellow duck contributed by my 4 year old son.
MMW said:I'm a new owner of a RX-V2067/Apex 5.1 system and for some reasons I have just only two options to wiring my system, the Chord Carnival Silver Screen or QED Silver Anniversary XT. As far as I know QED SA-XT it´s open and extremely detailed and in some systems maybe a bit bright and the Chord carnival SS warmer and more midbass oriented and slightly less open compared to the QED.
In my area I have no chance to hear them wiring a system like the one I own so I´ll appreciate any comments from owners or sellers about pros and cons of each cable in this particular system.
Thanks a lot in advance!
ric71 said:Hi Ricky, All is well thank you. Hope you are still enjoying the new apartment. I find the Arcam sounds very smooth and detailed.It never sounds flustered or strained it just remains smooth as the volume increases. I used to own a Lexicon DC2 processor hooked up to either ADA or Parasound multichannel power amps at a cost of over £5000. I find the Arcam smoother and a more enjoyable listen. This was with a big old Def Tech speaker system that would play to silly spl's with tons of headroom . The Arcam and Apex give a more detailed listen without any fatigue. I only listen in Pro logic2 music as I don't really find stereo involving enough from any set up no matter the price point. In this respect the Apex are fantastic as a sub sat system. I have tried stereo and the A10's do an admirable job with a sub but they shine in multichannel music listening hence my reason for buyIng them. I use a cd transport connected via dig coax and let the Arcam's dac's decode hence I will get the Oppo 93 rather than 95 as it will again be used as a transport via dig coax so will not utilise it's dac's. As for software issues the 500 has been fine. No fans no running too hot. It does the odd thing evey now and again but so did my Denon. I would not change it. The Anthem though would interest me but I have no regrets with the 500. The 600 is a very similar listen but with the network features etc and a bit more power. For the price of a 500 in the UK at the moment it is an absolute bargain.
RickyDeg said:Well, it's done - I've ordered the highly praised Anthem MRX700 for at-home-testing from my (kind) dealer. I'll be running it for about 2 weeks to see what it can do for my Apex and indeed my room with it's much-hyped ARC room correction system.
Here's to hoping it won't leave me with that same lame impression I got of the Pioneer SC-LX83 when I tested it this summer...
FrankHarveyHiFi said:RickyDeg said:Well, it's done - I've ordered the highly praised Anthem MRX700 for at-home-testing from my (kind) dealer. I'll be running it for about 2 weeks to see what it can do for my Apex and indeed my room with it's much-hyped ARC room correction system.
Here's to hoping it won't leave me with that same lame impression I got of the Pioneer SC-LX83 when I tested it this summer...
Having heard both in our demo rooms, I'll be interested to see what you think of it...
Jase Brown said:Hi, thanks for the info. Do you think I'd be ok with 5 A10's instead of the big A40 centre as I don't think I can accommodate it?
jb001e9634 said:I'm currently using 3 x A40 fronts and 2 x A10 rears with a Yamaha 2065 + Rotel RMB 985 power amp (5 x 100 @ 8 ohms all channels driven).
I've got an itch at the moment that onlu an upgrade will fix and I don;t want to change my speakers. Has anyone any experience of the APEX with either
- Bryston 9B SST (5 x 140)
- Rotel 1095 (5 x 200)
- Parasound (5 x 250)
Will an amp with more oomph give me better SQ at a given level or am I at the limit in terms of gains with the kit I have?
Cheers,
JB