Synology 112J vs 212J

rendu

New member
Sep 10, 2008
192
0
0
Visit site
Hello, I am considering the possibility of adding a NAS to my current setting. Based on comments from the forum, I am considering synology and looking at either 112J or 212J. The price difference between both is around 40 Eur. Apart from the fact that 212J allows 2 disks instead or one, are there any other major differences in terms of pure hardware? Also, any difference in terms of funcionality, this is, can you do the same with both?
 

brendonw

New member
May 24, 2010
26
0
0
Visit site
You can do a direct compare 1 product against another here

http://www.synology.com/products/compare_spec.php?lang=uk

But the short answer to your question is yes functionality is the same :)
 

professorhat

Well-known member
Dec 28, 2007
992
22
18,895
Visit site
brendonw said:
You could always buy the 2 bay and 1 disk and add a further disk in a few months time.......

Recommended - 2 disks in RAID can protect you from a hard disk failure. You still need a backup copy in case of accidental deletion / corruption, but 2 disks in a RAID provides redundancy against hard disk failure and ensures all your data is still safe if this happens.
 

rendu

New member
Sep 10, 2008
192
0
0
Visit site
Thanks for all the input, I had already tried to do the comparison in the synology web but it only compares the hardware specs which to me are difficult to understand.

I still do not get clear whether both allow to do exactly the same things so e.i. whether there are any differences from the functional stand point. Anyway, if I end up buying synology, I will probably go for the 212J even though I do not need 2 bays or even backup feature at this point. However, I have just found another option which meets my requirements and it is much much cheaper and also has good reviews.

http://www.expertreviews.co.uk/network-storage/1289791/zyxel-nsa310

This one seems to do all I want (basically streaming movies and music) for much lower price and has got good reviews.

Any additional information which may help on the decission making process will be appreciated.
 

professorhat

Well-known member
Dec 28, 2007
992
22
18,895
Visit site
rendu said:
I still do not get clear whether both allow to do exactly the same things so e.i. whether there are any differences from the functional stand point.

Functionally, they will do the same thing, apart from the resiliency (note, not backup) I mentioned in my previous post.
 

Paul.

Well-known member
Slightly left field suggestion, but how bout one of these?

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/B00AHQUX86

I want one, just waiting for the cash back to come back. They were down to £99 but missed it by a day due to odd cash back terms :(
 

cheeseboy

New member
Jul 17, 2012
245
1
0
Visit site
Paul. said:
Slightly left field suggestion, but how bout one of these?

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/B00AHQUX86

I want one, just waiting for the cash back to come back. They were down to £99 but missed it by a day due to odd cash back terms :(

they are excellent. And you can stick vmware on it and run the synology software as well :) Or you can use it to run XBMC and do the whole shebang in one box :)
 

TRENDING THREADS