Just back from an extended holiday, and I hit the ground running today with my first speaker demo, and a real curate's egg of a demo it was.
While away I did a fair bit of trawling the webby-thing and managed to source most of your suggestions (or at least the ones that fitted my initial spec, which was for speakers not wider than 250mm or deeper than 350mm). Over the next couple of months I'll be demoing some of the usual suspects (PMC, Proac, Neat ...) and some stuff from the further reaches (Devore, Audiovector ...).
First up was an odd contrast: Spendor D7 and Vivid V1.
The Spendors are smart, elegant floorstanders. The Vivids, though not as outlandish as their Giya models, look as though they were grown in a petri dish on the planet Zog.
The source was a Mac playing ALAC files into the Dev 170 via USB.
My first impression of the Spendors was positive. It was a solo violin piece, and the D7s sounded very correct and delicate, with good transients, though I did note that there seemed to be a lack of air (reverberation) around the violin, and the top end was a tad furry. As I moved into more complex music, things fell apart completely. The mid-range was pinched and unnatural. Vocals were simply awful: thin, strained and nasal, with no warmth or richness. Overall the presentation, whilst nicely fast and dynamic, was lean and forced.
My first thought was to blame the room acoustics. No concessions had been made to room conditioning; the wall behind the listening position was covered in faux leather and was obviously reflective. In fact, I was about to flounce out. I mean, it seemed inconceivable that a pair of Spendors, which were allegedly run in and properly connected to the Dev, could sound this poor.
But, hey, why not give the Vivids a blast first ...
A blast indeed. The Vivids really are very impressive speakers, once you get past the weird-space-creature looks. I've heard the Dev before through Harbeths (Super HL5s and M30.1s) and SF Cremona Auditor Ms. The Vivids gave virtually nothing away in terms of overal SQ, and in some departments they were simply better.
First: excellent dynamics. The sound has a powerful, muscular feel. As I turned the volume up I felt I was being hit by a hammer of loveliness. Imaging was also outstanding, with loads of space around the instruments and a tremendous sense of scale, especially on opera.
Tonally the sound seemed true: string and piano tones were alive but also round and rich.
It's become clear to me that what I'm after above all is a presentation that digs deep into the music's structure but remains coherent and smooth. This is what the Harbeths and SFs did, and the Vivids did it too. But they also seemed to add a sense of drama.
If I were to be critical, I'd say that the top end was slightly rolled off and lacked a smidge of sparkle, not in a dull way -- these speakers are never going to be dull -- but there just seemed to be a tiny something missing which I remember especially from the SFs and the Super HL5s.
Having said that, these speakers do voices brilliantly. No unwanted breathiness or sibilance, just wonderful expressiveness and presence.
Now you might say that after the disappointment of the Spendors (and I still can't help thinking that something was wrong with them), the Vivids had it easy. They'll need to be auditioned against more serious competition. And they're certainly worth a second audition!
I'd strongly recommend an audition if you get a chance.
:cheers: