John Duncan
Well-known member
TuneIn Radio Pro is built in to Sonos. I'm waiting for J to come off the phone to try your other use cases.
John Duncan said:TuneIn Radio Pro is built in to Sonos. I'm waiting for J to come off the phone to try your other use cases.
chebby said:bigboss said:chebby said:bigboss said:Sonos does AirPlay.
Play 5 only 'does' AirPlay if an AirPort Express is connected with the minijack line in...
http://www.sonos.com/airplay/
So again, more cables, another mains connection, another £80 and connected via a minijack cable (therefore using the rather poor DAC in the AEX rather than the internal DAC in the Sonos device).
No, that's wrong. I regularly play songs from my iPad on my Sonos. I used to have AirPort Express, but after an update, the AirPort Express is in my drawer!
Does the AirPlay (on your Sonos) also work when you bring up BBC iPlayer (Radio or TV) on your phone / tablet and does TuneIn Radio Pro work via AirPlay on these devices?
Or does it only work with iTunes?
chebby said:(Having looked at the Playbar you suggested, I really don't want one! It's wider than any telly we'll ever own.)
chebby said:John Duncan said:TuneIn Radio Pro is built in to Sonos. I'm waiting for J to come off the phone to try your other use cases.
Please, you really don't need to.
The lack of optical on the Play 5 kills it stone dead anyway.
bigboss said:iPlayer does not work via AirPlay.
bigboss said:Play:5 has a line-in to connect your TV to.
bigboss said:I'm only giving you options. You're bent on the A7 anyway.
bigboss said:I'm only giving you options.
chebby said:bigboss said:Play:5 has a line-in to connect your TV to.
So you suggest going from a direct optical digital audio connection, from my TV to the DAC in my Marantz (or the B&W A7 in our discussion), to an analogue minijack line-in connection?
I prefer a direct digital path.
HDMI connectected (from BDP and PVR) to TV and then uncoverted optical digital audio straight to the DAC in the hi-fi. No sync issues and top quality.
steve_1979 said:"Sony doesn't see hi-res audio as a narrow, niche market. In Anderson's view, some of the firm's customers already want it, while others will have to be educated about the benefits of better-than-MP3 audio."
http://www.whathifi.com/blog/ifa-2013-sony-puts-the-focus-on-hi-res-audio-and-4k-tv
The above quote seems like an about turn for Sony. Wasn't it Sony who did the research with Apple a few years ago and found that lossy AAC files could sound identical to lossless audio?
They didn't even make their MP3 players FLAC compatible because they deemed it unnecessary in terms of replay sound quality.
John Duncan said:steve_1979 said:"Sony doesn't see hi-res audio as a narrow, niche market. In Anderson's view, some of the firm's customers already want it, while others will have to be educated about the benefits of better-than-MP3 audio."
http://www.whathifi.com/blog/ifa-2013-sony-puts-the-focus-on-hi-res-audio-and-4k-tv
The above quote seems like an about turn for Sony. Wasn't it Sony who did the research with Apple a few years ago and found that lossy AAC files could sound identical to lossless audio?
They didn't even make their MP3 players FLAC compatible because they deemed it unnecessary in terms of replay sound quality.
Echo...echo...echo...
steve_1979 said:John Duncan said:steve_1979 said:"Sony doesn't see hi-res audio as a narrow, niche market. In Anderson's view, some of the firm's customers already want it, while others will have to be educated about the benefits of better-than-MP3 audio."
http://www.whathifi.com/blog/ifa-2013-sony-puts-the-focus-on-hi-res-audio-and-4k-tv
The above quote seems like an about turn for Sony. Wasn't it Sony who did the research with Apple a few years ago and found that lossy AAC files could sound identical to lossless audio?
They didn't even make their MP3 players FLAC compatible because they deemed it unnecessary in terms of replay sound quality.
Echo...echo...echo...
Apologies if that's already been mentioned in the thread. I couldn't be bothered to read through all of it.
John Duncan said:steve_1979 said:John Duncan said:steve_1979 said:"Sony doesn't see hi-res audio as a narrow, niche market. In Anderson's view, some of the firm's customers already want it, while others will have to be educated about the benefits of better-than-MP3 audio."
http://www.whathifi.com/blog/ifa-2013-sony-puts-the-focus-on-hi-res-audio-and-4k-tv
The above quote seems like an about turn for Sony. Wasn't it Sony who did the research with Apple a few years ago and found that lossy AAC files could sound identical to lossless audio?
They didn't even make their MP3 players FLAC compatible because they deemed it unnecessary in terms of replay sound quality.
Echo...echo...echo...
Apologies if that's already been mentioned in the thread. I couldn't be bothered to read through all of it.
It's more when you copy and paste the same thing across a number of forums...
spiny norman said:To get back on topic, yes – Sony has got way behind on high-resolution audio
steve_1979 said:Not everyone on this forum reads the AVI forum so I thought it was worth repeating here too.
steve_1979 said:the profitable audiophool cake
chebby said:steve_1979 said:Not everyone on this forum reads the AVI forum so I thought it was worth repeating here too.
Why dupicate it here when people can go and look at the actual AVI forum themselves if they wish?
Is it that 'missionary' thing again?